The Great Exhibition at Crystal Palace, 1851 / British Library
As a communication medium, the world’s fairs of the 19th century were the contemporary equivalent of the present-day world wide web. Given their enormous attendance figures, which far exceeded the reach of all other media, the historical significance of international exhibitions can hardly be overstated. From the opening of the “Great Exhibition of the Works of Industry of All Nations” in London in May 1851 onward, large expositions were held periodically in almost all major cities. The aim was to present to an international audience a miniature version of the world that was as true to scale as possible, present only for a limited time at a clearly defined site within the ever-changing host city. This article gives an overview of the historical development of this 19th century mass- and meta-medium, describes its most significant forms, functions and effects, and discusses the extent to which world’s fairs in Europe have decreased in impact since the beginning of the 20th century.
Introduction: Global Mass Spectacle of the 19th Century
The first world exhibition took place in 1851 in a specially built “Crystal Palace” in London’s Hyde Park. This Great Exhibition, which was sponsored mainly by Prince Albert (1819–1861), the husband of Queen Victoria (1819–1901), was a tremendous success, attracting millions of visitors. / Engraving by George Cruikshank, 1851, Library of Congress
The Great Exhibition of the Works of Industry of All Nations, opened by 1 The trade fairs that had taken place from the Middle Ages onward had served purely commercial purposes, while the industrial exhibitions held from the late-18th century onward were not aimed at an international audience. The Great Exhibition, by contrast, marked the beginning of a rapid development, which saw large expositions growing into the most popular and effective mass medium of the 19th century, and by no means only in . World’s fairs were also held in the (from 1876), and soon after in (from 1880). In the second half of the 20th century (from 1970), they also took place in . Exhibitions were viewed as markers of progress, prosperity, civilization and modernity. They presented these qualities to a mass public through a mixture of “didacticism” and “worldliness”. Such a combination was often discussed disparagingly but was nonetheless viewed as indispensable.2 As elaborately arranged spectacles of societal self-representation and highly regarded sites for the , world’s fairs were of global historical significance particularly during the second half of the 19th century.and her German husband on May 1, 1851 in ‘s Hyde Park can be regarded as the first large international exposition of the modern type. Never before had so many people of different nationalities gathered in a place like this – the made-for-purpose Crystal Palace.
The international universal exhibitions of the 19th century claimed to be encyclopaedic in scope and documentary in approach. Their aim was to present a miniature version of the world that was as true to scale as possible, present only for a limited time at a clearly defined site within the host city. Organized at regular intervals, these exhibitions saw objects considered representative of their places of origin brought together from all continents of the world. Artefacts were displayed in accordance with repeatedly re-configured classificatory systems, which became ever more complex and regionally-specific.3 World’s fairs were visited by millions of people hailing from the respective host city itself, the region and the nation as well as unprecedented numbers of international visitors. In this way, they experimented with possible forms of a future mass and global society. World’s fairs thus inhabited a space between locality, nationality and . They were also characterized by a decidedly European dimension: The expositions held in Europe enabled to be experienced culturally in a new cohesive form. World’s fairs depended not only on the prerequisites of global travel and transportation, global communication and a global society, but they also played a central role in their very formation. In the context of the so-called first wave of globalization, expositions actively promoted and accelerated international entanglement.
The stylistic vocabulary of the new medium initially developed in the context of intra-European competition between capital cities – initially between London (1851, 1862) and 4(1855, 1867, 1878, 1889, 1900, 1937), and subsequently between Paris and (1888, 1897, 1910, 1935, 1958). Later in the 19th century, large expositions were also held in (1873), (1885, 1894, 1930), (1888, 1929/1930), (1884, 1911), (1905), (1906) and elsewhere. Their infrastructural requirements alone dictated that large expositions were an exclusively urban phenomenon. The first two European world expositions not held in their respective capital cities were the “Exposición universal de Barcelona” in 1888 and the “Exposition universelle et internationale” in Liège in 1905. Besides and , became an influential host country, though it has yet to receive the attention it deserves in the burgeoning exhibition historiography. , by contrast, played a lesser role among the hosts of large exhibitions prior to the opening of EXPO 2000 in on May 31, 2000. With the exception of the Trade Fair held in Treptower Park in 1896, all attempts to organize a world’s fair in Germany – even in the imperial capital – failed, though various political circles repeatedly called for such an event, particularly after the unification of 1871.
The first Ferris wheel was erected at the Chicago World Fair (1893). It would become the symbol and main attraction of the World’s Columbian Exposition. / Brooklyn Museum
Number of International Expositions Held in Europe, the USA and the Rest of the World by Decade, 1851−2010; Graphic: © Goesta Roever Design-Team.
In the period prior to the Second World War, important expositions were also held outside Europe, for instance in 5 Within a short time, a repeatedly renewed “world wide web” of inherently transient great exhibitions (British English), expositions universelles (French), world’s fairs (American English) and Weltausstellungen (German) covered the western hemisphere. Participation promised to elevate each visitor to a cosmopolitan, each host city to a global city, and each host country to a “world power”.6(1853/1854, 1939/1940), (1876, 1926), (1879/1880), (1880/1881, 1888/1889), (1893, 1933/1934), (1904), (1894, 1915, 1939/1940) and elsewhere. The Centennial Exhibition which took place in Philadelphia in 1876 to celebrate the centenary of the American Declaration of Independence demonstrated for the first time the technological and industrial might of the United States, resurgent after the Civil War. In retrospect, the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago proved the defining moment for the USA, just as the Great Exhibition had been for Great Britain. Opened just one year after the 400th anniversary celebration of the of America, it set the standards by which the success or failure of all subsequent large expositions were judged.
Visitor Numbers for International Expositions in Millions, 1851−2010, graphic: © Goesta Roever Design-Team
According to contemporary estimates, around 415 million people visited the international expositions held in Europe between 1851 and 1958. The period between 1885 and the Second World War accounts for three quarters of this figure. More than 110 million people attended the five Expositions universelles in Paris, which were held in set intervals of eleven years – the so-called règle des onze années – on the Champ de Mars in the centre of the French capital. The last in this series, the Exposition universelle et internationale de Paris 1900, set a record of over 50 million visitors, not surpassed until Expo 67 in 7. This figure corresponded to the entire population of the in 1900 and was considerably more than the population of France itself at that time. Prior to the introduction of television in the 1930s, no other medium reached a larger, more cosmopolitan and more heterogeneous audience.
Forms: The World in the City
The sites of the five world’s fairs in Paris in the 19th century (1855, 1867, 1878, 1889, 1900) are placed in direct comparison here, albeit in different scales. From 1867 onward, all such expositions were held on the large, centrally located Champ de Mars. Through the inclusion of more and more areas, the total land used expanded far beyond the Champ de Mars from 1878 onward, and it ballooned between 1855 (16 hectares) and 1900 (108 hectares) by a factor of seven. By each adding a new monument to the urban fabric – in 1878 the Palais du Trocadéro which was only demolished in 1934, in 1889 the Eiffel Tower and in 1900 the Grand Palais, the Petit Palais and the Pont Alexandre III – the Parisian world’s fairs successively contributed to the embellishment and symbolic loading of an already important site of memory. / Albert Montheuil, Les Expositions universelles 1855–1900, in: L’Illustration 54 (08/02/1896), p. 118
Begun in January 1887, the construction of the Eiffel tower, initially known as tour de trois cents mètres, was completed one and a half months before the opening of the Paris exposition universelle in 1889. The initially heavily criticised tower was undoubtedly the highlight of the second last Paris world exhibition in the 19th century and until 1930 remained the highest building of the world. / © Donald G. Larson Collection on International Expositions and Fairs, Henry Madden Library, California State University, Fresno
World’s fairs were characterized by a curious mixture of fleeting transience and legacy-creating endurance. As the duration of the expositions was usually limited to six months – over the summer and into the autumn – it was clear prior to opening that the majority of the specially constructed pavilions and architectural ensembles would be demolished after the event’s closure. Consequently, the sites and buildings created for these occasions were transitory by character. This had a defining influence on the expositions, as the rapidly expanding exhibition sites had to be written into the urban fabric of the host city and adapted to its infrastructure. Even though world’s fairs tended not to leave much in the way of material remnants in situ, lasting legacies were nonetheless created and local traditions established. The most famous European remnants are the Crystal Palace, rebuilt in south London in 1854 after the end of the Great Exhibition but completely destroyed by fire in 1936, and the Eiffel Tower in Paris, known to contemporaries as the tour de trois cents mètres. Built as the main attraction of the Exposition universelle held in 1889 to mark the hundredth anniversary of the 8, it was decided – contrary to original plans – not to demolish the tower because it had become so popular with the public, despite strong initial criticism. The Eiffel Tower remained the highest building in the world until 1930. Thus, the omnipresent tower that dwarfed everything else went from being the symbolic focal point of the exposition to the visual focal point of the French capital, and subsequently the marker and universal symbol of the whole nation. The Eiffel Tower was declared a protected monument in 1964.
It was not just the size of the exposition site that grew from one world’s fair to the next. The number of exhibitors, expenses, sections and visitors also increased with each event. Celebrated as a peaceful competition between the nations for “peace, progress and prosperity”, each exposition sought to outdo the preceding ones.9 Indeed, contemporary critics repeatedly discussed whether any subsequent fair could possibly be grander. In the early expositions, exhibitors’ displays were accommodated under the roof of a single exhibition hall such as the Crystal Palace in London, the oval Palais in Paris (1867) or the enormous Ausstellungspalast (1873) in Vienna, which was arranged around a central rotunda. However, the so-called pavilion principle was introduced in Philadelphia in 1876 and subsequently continued in Europe two years later with the Rue des Nations in Paris. The encyclopaedic scope was now overlaid with a national principle. Each participating nation was asked to represent itself by building its own national pavilion, and thus became responsible for creating its own attraction. After decades of rapid but chaotic development in the organization of such international exhibitions, on November 22, 1928 an agreement anchored in international law was reached. It made adherence to the pavilion principle a prerequisite for a world’s fair to be considered within the top-echelon, so-called “first category”, of expositions. The agreement also included the introduction of a binding procedure for the application and awarding of such a status. In 1931 the Bureau International des Expositions (BIE) was established in Paris to implement this procedure.10 While the boundaries between the multitude of global, industrial, commercial, colonial and other forms of large urban exhibitions with national, bi-national and international participation had previously been anything but clearly defined, the new agreement established a firm distinction between “universal” world’s fairs and international exhibitions, which were to focus on a specific topic. The former are held every five years and are characterized by the pavilion principle and an unlimited physical exhibition area. The latter occur only in the period between two world’s fairs, their respective exhibition space is limited to a maximum of 25 hectares, and the host country provides the pavilions. Both exposition types, world’s fairs and international exhibitions, must be officially recognized by the BIE.11
Functions: National Prestige, Imperial Propaganda and International Power Politics
Contemporary commentators identified world’s fairs as “nodes in the course of history” and crystallization points in the 12 Critical historical events, processes and debates became visible to a global public at these exhibitions. Their reception was shaped by the specific rules regarding representation and display that had developed from the mid-19th century and adapted to the resulting media standards of the world’s fair system. The sociocultural effects attributed to expositions went far beyond merely gathering objects and displaying them to a mass public at regular intervals. Designed and held as local events, for national actors they represented highly complex sites of exchange and encounter, but also of comparison and adjustment, differentiation and competition. Numerous , which discussed such questions as the of measurements, weights and patents, were held in cooperation with world’s fairs., at which global progress was made manifest in material form.
German Emperor Wilhelm II (1859–1941), centre, visiting a group of Ethiopians at Hagenbeck’s Tierpark in Hamburg in 1909. / German Federal Archive via Wikimedia Commons
Notwithstanding the importance of symbolic and representational aspects, the geopolitical and economic dimensions of these expositions should not be underestimated. World’s fairs not only oscillated between locality, nationality and internationality, but also between economic cooperation, confrontation and competition on the one hand, and Eurocentrism, cosmopolitanism and 13 They reflected, generated and reinforced imperial orders of and . This became particularly apparent in efforts to present not only the latest technological advances of the present, but also “alien” civilizations and “exotic” peoples. Thus, exhibitions sought to bring colonial alterity to the domestic public. The “Colonial and Indian Exhibition” held in 1886 in South Kensington in London was the first in a half-century long series of British expositions exclusively focused on imperialism.14 During the same period, so-called native villages were soon part of the expositions’ standard repertoire. The businessman and zoo founder became a global market-leader in this area, providing “wild” animals and people not only for travelling , but also for larger national and international exhibitions all around the world. These “native villages” with their human exhibits proved to be of central importance for the overall effect of these exhibitions because their presence gave the necessary air of authenticity to everything else on display. “Wild” people could not be reproduced artificially and were thus viewed as a guarantee of the spectacle’s overall veracity.15on the other. By trying to prove the superiority of western technology, economics and “civilization”, 19th-century expositions displayed the universalist claims of the west.
As grand “marriages of art and industry” (Raphael Samuel), large international exhibitions played a significant and often underestimated economic role, particularly compared to the singular focus much academic research has had on the ethnographic dimension of the exhibition phenomenon. “Weltausstellungen sind die Wallfahrtsstätten zum Fetisch Ware” is a classic quote from 16 New commercial and industrial products, technologies and inventions were often displayed for the first time at expositions. These included cast-iron blocks by Krupp, which increased markedly in size over the years, as well as every conceivable type of machine and the – up to 1900 – inevitable giant cannon. From the perspective of the state, world’s fairs served to promote “industriousness” and consumption, but also played a role in the cultivation of tastes. From an early stage, excursions were organized to these exhibitions, and special programmes provided stipends for workers, craftsmen as well as officials, and subsequently also school pupils, to attend. These visitors were then tasked with familiarizing themselves with the latest technological advances at the exhibition in order to report on them in detail after their return. Prizes and commendations awarded to individual exhibits by a specialist jury of host country representatives were much sought after by commercial exhibitors, as they proved to the domestic market that their products outshone any international competitors. The gold medal that the Beck brewery in Bremen won in Philadelphia in 1876 still adorns the label of every bottle of its beer..
Effects: Architecture, Urban Construction and Mega-Events
Present-day debates about the sense and purpose of so-called mega-events, their sustainability and subsequent utility, were not prominent in the 19th century exhibitionary deliberations. Large exhibitions were not planned as part of a future urban landscape until the middle of the 20th century, as evidenced by the construction of the Royal Festival Hall on London’s South Bank, the centrepiece of the 1951 “Festival of Britain”. However, earlier world’s fairs also proved to be effective catalysts of urban development and city planning. At the Viennese exhibition of 1873, as-yet-completed sections and monumental buildings of the Ring Road complex were presented to an international public. The 1888 Exposición universal in Barcelona also provided an impetus for the completion of ongoing city building projects in order to impress the international exposition public.17
Scene from the elevator ascending Eiffel Tower, Schwarz-Weiß-Film, 9 August 1900, by Thomas A. Edison / Library of Congress, Edison Motion Pictures
As exhibition sites became larger and increasingly complex, there was an urgent need to provide an overview of the whole in order to make sites visually accessible to visitors. This resulted in the prevalence of so-called “vertigo machines” such as viewing towers, giant Ferris wheels and hot-air balloons, which as “viewing apparatuses” helped to re-establish the unity of the spectacle in the perception of the observer.18 Increasing size, scale and heterogeneity also necessitated the provision of dining options on site, the direction of enormous flows of visitors on the site through inventions such as moving walkways and new modes of frictionless transportation to and from the exhibition site. World’s fairs in Chicago (1893), Paris (1900) and Montreal (1967) provided the incentive for the construction of the first underground railway systems in those cities.
Finally, numerous complex institutional connections can be identified, both between world’s fairs and museums, and also with mega-events such as the Olympic Games, resurrected in 1896. The close relationship between exhibitions and museums as similarly visualizing institutions, which however differ in terms of their time frames – exhibitions display their exhibits for a limited time period, while museums aim at permanence – can be traced back to the Great Exhibition of 1851 in London. Using some of the exhibits and the profits of the fair, the South Kensington Museum opened the following year in the direct vicinity of Hyde Park. It was the forerunner of the present-day Victoria and Albert Museum and the Science Museum, facing each other on Exhibition Road. There was a similar pattern to the foundation of the Museum of Science and Industry and the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago in 1893, as well as the 1931 Exposition coloniale in Paris which led to the creation of the Musée des arts africains et océaniens. The second, third and fourth Olympic Games of the modern age (Paris 1900; St. Louis 1904; London 1908) also took place as part of large international exhibitions and were integrated as sub-events. Such a close institutional connection between world’s fairs and the Olympic Games, however, did not continue in the further course of the 20th century. Separated organizationally and functionally, the Olympics have long replaced expositions as focal points of transient global attention.19
Conclusion: Loss of Significance in the 20th Century
World’s fairs took their visitors on imaginary journeys in time and space. While the expositions of the 19th century were defined by the establishment and canonisation of the form as well as a specific “exhibition language” which incorporated ever more areas, at the beginning of the 20th century exhibitions returned to specialization and decentralization, at times reminiscent of early pre-1851 events. There is now a widely-shared consensus that large international exhibitions experienced a noticeable diminution of cultural impact over the course of the 20th century, at least in 20and the United States. Only the exact point in time when this process of decline began continues to be a subject of debate. From the beginning, world’s fairs were reported on and critiqued extensively, but in the context of increasing competition from film, radio and television and simplified from the 1880s onward, they entered a discursive crisis. From at least the turn of the century, expositions were no longer viewed as the leading meta-medium of modern civilization. This phenomenon came to be known as “exhibition fatigue”. Understood in both the active and passive sense, such “fatigue” was attributed to the oversupply of national and international exhibitions, which resulted – the interpretation continued – in declining interest among the public and consequently in the declining effectiveness of the medium as a means of promoting progress.
At the Parisian universal exposition of 1937, the imposing neoclassical towers constructed by National Socialist Germany and the Stalinist Soviet Union competed with each other in both stature and impact. This threatening tableau illustrated the competition between the two systems and the upcoming confrontation between the two great powers. Architects Albert Speer (1905–1981) and Boris Iofan (1891–1976) were both awarded a gold medal by the French organizers. / © Donald G. Larson Collection on International Expositions and Fairs
The 102-metre-high Atomium was the main attraction of Expo 58 in Brussels and is considered a spectacular symbol of the nuclear age. Nine connected balls, each 18 metres in diameter, form an iron crystal magnified 165 billion times. Similar to the Eiffel Tower in Paris, it was originally intended to be demolished after the exposition’s closure. / © Donald G. Larson Collection on International Expositions and Fairs
This widely held view was paradoxical. In spite of their obvious loss of significance, important world’s fairs nevertheless continued to be held throughout the 20th century, attracting millions of visitors. A prominent example is the last of the great Parisian expositions, the Exposition internationale des arts et techniques dans la vie moderne of 1937, particularly memorable for the highly symbolic confrontation between the German National Socialist and Soviet pavilions beneath the Trocadéro on the right bank of the Seine.21 From the 1939/40 world’s fair in New York onward, which used the advertising slogan “Building the world of tomorrow with the tools of today”, there was a perceptible reorientation from grand achievements towards progress considered critical for the future.22 Futuristic topics such as future means of transportation, the peaceful use of nuclear energy and in particular spaceflight played a central role in world’s fairs in the post-war period, for example in Brussels (1958), (1962), Montreal (1967) and (1970). This reorientation also manifested itself in the main attractions. The Atomium in Brussels, the Space Needle in Seattle and the Unisphere in New York are still considered symbols of an optimistic and future-prone atomic space age.
Whether the historical argument is correct that world’s fairs have lost much of their function and significance in a transformed media landscape is in the eye of the observer. Critics would argue that they have long since outlived their purpose as a consequence of increasing specialization, commercialization and disneyfication in the information and communication age. From a western standpoint, their loss in standing is unmistakeable, but from a global perspective it appears more like a shift in significance. The first German world’s fair, EXPO 2000 in Hanover, was generally viewed as an expensive failure in spite of all efforts towards sustainability and re-usability, given that the number of visitors fell far short of what was expected. The United States completely cancelled its membership of the BIE in 2001, in line with a decision of Congress from 1998 which forbid the future use of tax revenue for representing the country at exhibitions abroad, and has not participated in any bidding process to hold an exposition since. Yet this decline is in stark contrast with the enormous success of non-western exhibitions over the last 40 years. With nearly 65 million and 73 million visitors respectively, Expo ’70 in Osaka in Japan and Expo 2010 in 23in China were by far the two best-attended world’s fairs of all time. In early 1998, , then editor-in-chief of ZEIT, reacted specifically to the accusation that large international exhibitions are anachronistic and obsolete – an accusation that had been repeatedly made since the late-19th century. He suggested that it would be better to simply transfer EXPO 2000 to the internet, the early-21st-century media equivalent of the world’s fair.
Benjamin, Walter: Paris, die Hauptstadt des XIX. Jahrhunderts, in: idem: Gesammelte Schriften, edited by Rolf Tiedemann et al., Frankfurt am Main 1982, vol. 5: Das Passagen-Werk, pp. 45–59.
Benjamin, Walter: Paris: Capital of the Nineteenth Century, in: Perspecta 12 (1969), pp. 165–172.
Brandt, L. Otto: Zur Geschichte und Würdigung der Weltausstellungen, in: Zeitschrift für Socialwissenschaft 7 (1904), pp. 81–96.
Bucher, Lothar: Kulturhistorische Skizzen aus der Industrieausstellung aller Völker, Frankfurt am Main 1851, online: http://www.mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn=urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb10434762-1 [11/01/2018].
Démy, Adolphe: Essai historique sur les expositions universelles de Paris, Paris 1907, online: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5497478z [11/01/2018].
Geddes, Patrick: Industrial Exhibitions and Modern Progress, Edinburgh 1887, online: http://www.archive.org/details/industrialexhib00geddgoog [11/01/2018].
Lessing, Julius: Das halbe Jahrhundert der Weltausstellungen: Vortrag gehalten in der Volkswirthschaftlichen Gesellschaft zu Berlin, Berlin 1900, online: http://www.mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn=urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb11022761-6 [11/01/2018].
Meissonier, Ernest et al.: Protestation contre la Tour de M. Eiffel, in: Le Temps (14 February 1887), online: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k231310n/f2.image [11/01/2018].
Messel, Alfred: Ausstellungsbauten, in: Josef Durm et al. (eds.): Handbuch der Architektur, Darmstadt 1893, 4. Teil, 6. Hbbd., 4. Heft, pp. 472–534, online: fbc.pionier.net.pl/id/oai:www.dbc.wroc.pl:12617 [11/01/2018].
Moonen, Leo: Exhibitions: Their Origin, Aim, Influence, and Results; and the Utility of a Prominent Exhibition Commission, Melbourne 1883.
Naumann, Friedrich: Ausstellungsbriefe, Berlin 1909, online: http://www.archive.org/details/ausstellungsbri00naumgoog [11/01/2018].
Paquet, Alfons: Das Ausstellungsproblem in der Volkswirtschaft, Jena 1908.
Protocol modifying the International convention relating to Exhibitions of 22nd November, 1928. Paris, 10th May, 1948. (With exchange of notes of 1st/9th September, 1949, providing for the accession of H.M.’s Government to the Convention and Protocol as from 2nd September, 1949) / Presented by the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs to Parliament, 1951, British Library, Series: Cmd.; 8311; Treaty series ; No. 57 (1951); Shelfmark(s): Document Supply OP-Cmd.8311; UIN: BLL01015231946.
Schröder, Gerhard: Rede von Bundeskanzler Schröder zur Eröffnung der Weltausstellung Expo 2000 am 31. Mai 2000 in Hannover, in: Bulletin der Bundesregierung 34 (2 June 2000), 1–3, online: http://dp.expo2000.de/gesellschafter/rede.html [11/01/2018].
Simmel, Georg: Berliner Gewerbe-Ausstellung, in: Die Zeit 8.95 (25 July 1896), pp. 59–60.
Sombart, Werner: Die Ausstellung, in: Morgen: Wochenschrift für deutsche Kultur 9 (28 February 1908), pp. 249–256.
The Books of the Fairs: Materials about World’s Fairs, 1834–1916, Chicago, IL 1992 [extensive microfilm collection of the Smithsonian Institution Libraries that can be viewed in the university libraries in Braunschweig, Hamburg-Harburg, Göttingen and Regensburg, as well as in the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek in Munich].
Witt, Otto N.: Pariser Weltausstellungsbriefe, Berlin 1900.
Abbattista, Guido: Umanità in mostra: Esposizioni etniche e invenzioni esotiche in Italia (1880–1940), Trieste 2013.
Audenino, Patrizia et al. (eds.): Milano e l’Esposizione internazionale del 1906: la rappresentazione della modernità, Milan 2008.
Barth, Volker: Mensch versus Welt: Die Pariser Weltausstellung von 1867, Darmstadt 2007.
Barthes, Roland: La Tour Eiffel, Paris 1964.
Baumeister, Martin: Alteuropäische Städte auf dem Weg in die Moderne: Großausstellungen und metropolitane Identitäten in Turin und Barcelona 1884 bis 1929, in: Historische Anthropologie 10 (2002), pp. 449–463.
Benedict, Burton: The Anthropology of World’s Fairs, in: idem (ed.): The Anthropology of World’s Fairs: San Francisco’s Panama Pacific International Exposition of 1915, Berkeley, CA 1983, pp. 1–66.
Bennett, Tony: The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics, London 1995.
Cantor, Geoffrey: Emotional Reactions to the Great Exhibition of 1851, in: Journal of Victorian Culture 20 (2015), pp. 230–45.
Cauter, Lieven de: The Panoramic Ecstasy: On World Exhibitions and the Disintegration of Experience, in: Theory, Culture and Society 10 (1993), pp. 1–23.
Çelik, Zeynep: Displaying the Orient: Architecture of Islam at Nineteenth-Century World’s Fairs, Berkeley, CA 1992.
Chalkley, Brian / Essex, Stephen: Urban Development Through Hosting International Events: A History of the Olympic Games, in: Planning Perspectives 14 (1999), pp. 369–394.
Corbey, Raymond: Ethnographic Showcases, 1870–1930, in: Cultural Anthropology 8 (1993), pp. 338–369.
Espuche, A. G. et al.: Modernization and Urban Beautification: The 1888 Barcelona World’s Fair, in: Planning Perspectives 6 (1991), pp. 139–159.
Essex, Stephen / Chalkley, Brian: Olympic Games: Catalyst of Urban Change, in: Leisure Studies 17 (1998), pp. 187–206.
Findling, John E. et al. (eds.): Encyclopedia of World’s Fairs and Expositions, 2nd edition, Jefferson, NC 2008.
Galopin, Marcel: Les Expositions internationales au XXe siècle et le Bureau International des Expositions, Paris 1997.
Geppert, Alexander C.T.: Fleeting Cities: Imperial Expositions in Fin-de-Siècle Europe, Basingstoke 2010/2013.
Geppert, Alexander C.T.: Weltstadt für einen Sommer: Die Berliner Gewerbeausstellung 1896 im europäischen Kontext, in: Mitteilungen des Vereins für die Geschichte Berlins 103 (2007), pp. 434–448.
Geppert, Alexander C.T.: Welttheater: Die Geschichte des europäischen Ausstellungswesens im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert: Ein Forschungsbericht, in: Neue politische Literatur 47 (2002), pp. 10–61.
Geppert, Alexander C.T.et al. (eds.): Esposizioni in Europa tra Otto e Novecento: spazi, organizzazione, rappresentazioni, Milan 2004 (Memoria e Ricerca 17).
Gold, John Robert / Gold, Margaret M. (eds.): Olympic Cities: City Agendas, Planning and the World’s Games, 1896–2012, London 2007.
Gold, John Robert: Cities of Culture: Staging International Festivals and the Urban Agenda: 1851–2000, Aldershot 2005.
Greenhalgh, Paul: Ephemeral Vistas: The Expositions Universelles, Great Exhibitions and World’s Fairs: 1851–1939, Manchester 1988.
Hollengreen, Laura, Celia Pearce, Rebecca Rouse and Bobby Schweizer (eds.): Meet Me at the Fair: A World’s Fair Reader, Pittsburgh, PA 2014.
Großbölting, Thomas: “Im Reich der Arbeit”: Die Repräsentation gesellschaftlicher Ordnung in den deutschen Industrie- und Gewerbeausstellungen 1790–1914, Munich 2008.
Haltern, Utz: Die Londoner Weltausstellung von 1851: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der bürgerlich-industriellen Gesellschaft im 19. Jahrhundert, Münster 1971.
Haltern, Utz: Die “Welt als Schaustellung”: Zur Funktion und Bedeutung der internationalen Industrieausstellung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, in: Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte 60 (1973), pp. 1–40.
Harvey, Penelope: Hybrids of Modernity: Anthropology, the Nation State and the Universal Exhibition, London 1996.
Hedinger, Daniel: Im Wettstreit mit dem Westen: Japans Zeitalter der Ausstellungen 1854–1941, Frankfurt am Main 2011.
Hoffenberg, Peter H.: An Empire on Display: English, Indian, and Australian Exhibitions From the Crystal Palace to the Great War, Berkeley, CA 2001.
Kretschmer, Winfried: Geschichte der Weltausstellungen, Frankfurt am Main 1999.
Lenger, Friedrich: Metropolenkonkurrenz: Die Weltausstellungen in der zweiten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts, in: Journal of Modern European History 11 (2013), pp. 329–50.
Loyrette, Henri: La Tour Eiffel, in: Pierre Nora (ed.): Les Lieux de mémoire, Paris 1992, vol. 3.3, pp. 474–503.
Mathur, Saloni: Living Ethnological Exhibits: The Case of 1886, in: Cultural Anthropology 15 (2000), pp. 492–524.
Mieck, Ilja: Deutschland und die Pariser Weltausstellungen, in: Etienne François et al. (eds.): Marianne – Germania: Deutsch-französischer Kulturtransfer im europäischen Kontext: 1789–1914, Leipzig 1998, pp. 31–60.
Mitchell, Timothy: The World as Exhibition, in: Comparative Studies in Society and History 31 (1989), pp. 217–236.
Nye, David E.: Ritual Tomorrows: The New York World’s Fair of 1939, in: History and Anthropology 6 (1992), pp. 1–21.
Osterhammel, Jürgen: Die Verwandlung der Welt: Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts, Munich 2009.
Rosendorf, Neal: Expositions, in: Akira Iriye et al. (eds.): The Palgrave Dictionary of Transnational History, Basingstoke 2009, pp. 370–376.
Rydell, Robert W.: New Directions for Scholarship about World Expos, in: Kate Darian-Smith et al. (eds.): Seize the Day: Exhibitions, Australia and the World, Melbourne 2008, pp. 21.1–21.13.
Rydell, Robert W.: All the World’s a Fair: Visions of Empire at American International Expositions: 1876–1916, Chicago, IL 1984.
Rydell, Robert W.: World of Fairs: The Century-of-Progress Expositions, Chicago, IL 1993.
Scherpenberg, Norman van: Weltausstellungen: Völkerrechtlich geregelte Visionen, Baden-Baden 2000.
Sigel, Paul: Exponiert: Deutsche Pavillons auf Weltausstellungen, Berlin 2000.
Steinmetz, George: Empire in Three Keys: Forging the Imperial Imaginary at the 1896 Berlin Trade Exhibition, in: Thesis Eleven 139 (2017), pp. 46–68.
Thompson, William: “The Symbol of Paris”: Writing the Eiffel Tower, in: The French Review 73 (2000), pp. 1130–1140.
Udovički-Selb, Danilo: Facing Hitler’s Pavilion: The Uses of Modernity in the Soviet Pavilion at the 1937 Paris International Exhibition, Journal of Contemporary History 47 (2012), pp. 13–47.
Wang, Jian: Shaping China’s Global Imagination: Branding Nations at the World Expo, Basingstoke 2013.
Weck, Roger de: In Hannover? Nein, im Internet, in: Die Zeit 53 (13 February 1998), p. 1.
Wesemael, Pieter van: Architecture of Instruction and Delight: A Socio-Historical Analysis of World Exhibitions as a Didactic Phenomenon (1798–1851–1970), Rotterdam 2001.
http://www.csufresno.edu/library/subjectresources/specialcollections/worldfairs/ExpoBibliography3ed.pdf[“World’s Fairs: A Bibliography”: comprehensive bibliography listing more than 1,800 titles]
http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/helios/fachinfo/www/kunst/digilit/weltausstellungen/literaturliste.html [a bibliography on the history of world expositions compiled by Heidelberg University library]
http://www.sil.si.edu/libraries/nmah/subject_guide_selected_nmah.cfm?main_heading=World%27s%20Fairs%20and%20Expositions%20Resources [compilation of relevant internet resources of the library of the National Museum of American History]
http://ecollections.lib.csufresno.edu/cdm/landingpage/collection/worldsfair [historical images held by the Henry Madden Library]
http://beinecke.library.yale.edu/collections/highlights/worlds-fairs-and-landscapes-modern-metropolis [historical images held by Yale University Library]
http://www.ust.ucla.edu/ustweb/Projects/columbian_expo.htm [virtual simulation of the World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago (1893)]
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/edhtml/edac.html#EX [sixteen short clips held by the Library of Congress, which were filmed at the Paris World Exposition in July 1900 at the behest of Thomas A. Edison]
http://www.paris1914.com [unusual colour photographs of various Paris expositions of the early-20th century]
[All websites last accessed on 11/01/2018.]
- Still the best work on the Great Exhibition: Haltern, Londoner Weltausstellung 1971; cf. idem, “Welt als Schaustellung” 1973.
- Lessing, Das halbe Jahrhundert 1900, p. 18: “nicht nur der Mittelpunkt der Belehrung und des friedlichen Wettstreites, sondern auch der Mittelpunkt der Weltlust … für die ganze Welt.” (“not only the centre of instruction and peaceful competition, but also the centre of worldliness … for the whole world.”)
- On the history of classification systems: Benedict, Anthropology of World’s Fairs 1983, pp. 27–41. While four main categories sufficed at the Great Exhibition in London in 1851, the exhibits were divided into 26 different categories at the Weltausstellung in Vienna in 1873, in 1900 in Paris there were 18 categories.
- Geppert, Weltstadt für einen Sommer 2007, pp. 434–436; idem, Fleeting Cities 2010, pp. 16–61; Steinmetz, Empire in Three Keys 2017. On the history of German self-representation at international expositions in foreign countries, see: Sigel, Exponiert 2000, particularly pp. 21–24.
- Rydell, All the World’s a Fair 1984, p. 71.
- Naumann, Ausstellungsbriefe 1909, p. 28.
- Geppert, Fleeting Cities 2010, pp. 7–8; for a pertinent overview, ibid., pp. 250–255. All visitor numbers are based on contemporary statistical data, which was collected by various methods with varying degrees of accuracy.
- Loyrette, La Tour Eiffel 1992, and Thompson, “The Symbol of Paris” 2000, p. 1130; both make reference to Barthes, Tour Eiffel 1964, the locus classicus of all Eiffel Tower semiotics, and Meissonier, Protestation contre la Tour de M. Eiffel 1887.
- Moonen, Exhibitions 1883, p. 8; Cauter, Panoramic Ecstasy 1993, p. 7.
- Protocol 1951, Section II, Article 4; cf. also Scherpenberg, Weltausstellungen 2000, pp. 24–25.
- Cf. Galopin, Expositions internationales 1997 and http://www.bie-paris.org/site/en# [11/01/2018]. The next world exposition will take place in Dubai in 2020 with the theme “Connecting Minds, Creating the Future” (https://expo2020dubai.ae [11/01/2018]). The location for 2025 has not yet been determined (as of December 2017); Baku (Azerbaijan), Osaka (Japan), Paris (France) and Yekaterinburg (Russia) have bid to host the event.
- Lothar Bucher, quoted in Lessing, Das halbe Jahrhundert 1900, p. 7.
- Osterhammel, Verwandlung der Welt 2009, p. 41.
- Mathur, Living Ethnological Exhibits 2000, and Hoffenberg, Empire on Display 2001, pp. 49–55, 148–151.
- In academic discourse, these so-called ethnologic showcases and native villages have received particular attention over the last number of years due to the renewed interest in colonialism and can almost be described as over-researched; cf. Corbey, Ethnographic Showcases 1993, and Geppert, Welttheater 2002, pp. 34–36.
- Benjamin, Paris 1982, p. 50 (“World exhibitions were places of pilgrimage to the fetish Commodity.” Benjamin, Paris 1969, p. 167).
- Espuche, Modernization 1991, p. 148.
- Cauter, Panoramic Ecstasy 1993, pp. 17–20.
- Essex / Chalkley, Olympic Games 1998, p. 192; Chalkley / Essex, Urban Development 1999, p. 370; and Gold / Gold, Cities of Culture 2005.
- From the copious body of sources, cf. just Simmel, Berliner Gewerbe-Ausstellung 1896, p. 59; Witt, Pariser Weltausstellungsbriefe 1900, p. 1; Paquet, Ausstellungsproblem in der Volkswirtschaft 1908, pp. 287–297; Sombart, Ausstellung 1908, p. 254. In greater detail: Geppert, Fleeting Cities 2010, pp. 206–216.
- See Udovički-Selb, Facing Hitler’s Pavilion 2012.
- Nye, Ritual Tomorrows 1992, p. 4.
- Weck, In Hannover? 1998.
Originally published by EGO: Journal of European History Online under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license.