March 15, 2026

A Literal Wall Expert Explains the Flaw of a Border Wall

011219-34-Trump-Border-Wall-Immigration
A Literal Wall Expert Explains the Flaw of a Border Wall

A Literal Wall Expert Explains the Flaw of a Border Wall
The Mexican side of a border wall between U.S. and Mexico / Photo by Wonderlane, Flickr, Creative Commons

“Am I a wall expert? I am. I am literally a court-accepted expert on walls…the border wall is not a feasible project.


A Literal Wall Expert Explains the Flaw of a Border Wall

By Amy Patrick
Construction Defect Expert Witness and Forensic Structural Engineer
Adjunct Professor, University of Houston Downtown


Iโ€™m a licensed structural and civil engineer with a MS in structural engineering from the top program in the nation and over a decade of experience on high-performance projects, and particularly of cleaning up design disasters where the factors werenโ€™t properly accounted for, and Iโ€™m an adjunct professor of structural analysis and design at UH-Downtown. I have previously been deposed as an expert witness in matters regarding proper construction of walls and the various factors associated therein, and my testimony has passed Daubert.

Am I a wall expert? I am. I am literally a court-accepted expert on walls.

Structurally and civil engineering-wise, the border wall is not a feasible project. Trump did not hire engineers to design the thing. He solicited bids from contractors, not engineers. This means itโ€™s not been designed by professionals. Itโ€™s a disaster of numerous types waiting to happen.

What disasters?

Off the top of my headโ€ฆ

  1. It will mess with our ability to drain land in flash flooding. Anything impeding the ability of water to get where it needs to go (doesnโ€™t matter if there are holes in the wall or whatever) is going to dramatically increase the risk of flooding.
  2. Messes with all kind of stuff ecologically. For all other projects, we have to do an Environmental Site Assessment, which is arduous. Theyโ€™re either planning to circumvent all this, or they havenโ€™t accounted for it yet, because thatโ€™s part of the design process, and this thing hasnโ€™t been designed.
  3. The prototypes they came up with are nearly impossible to build or donโ€™t actually do the job. This article explains more.

And so on.

The estimates provided for the cost are arrived at unreasonably. You can look for yourself at the two-year-old estimate that you see everyone citing.

It does not account for rework, complexities beyond the prototype design, factors to prevent flood and environmental hazard creation, engineering redesignโ€ฆ Itโ€™s going to be higher than $50bn. The contractors will hit the government with near CONSTANT change orders. โ€œCost overrunโ€ will be the name of the game. It will not be completed in Trumpโ€™s lifetime.

Iโ€™m a structural forensicist, which means Iโ€™m called in when things go wrong. This is a project that WILL go wrong. When projects go wrong, the original estimates are just obliterated. And when that happens, good luck getting it fixed, because there arenโ€™t that many forensicists out there to right the ship, particularly not that are willing to work on a border wall projectโ€” a large quotient of us are immigrants, and besides, we canโ€™t afford to bid on jobs that are this political. Weโ€™re small firms, and weโ€™re already busy, and we donโ€™t gamble our reputations on political footballs. So youโ€™d end up with a revolving door of contractors making a giant, uncoordinated muddle of things, and itโ€™d generally be a mess. Good money after bad. The GAO agrees with me.

And it wonโ€™t be effective. I could, right now, purchase a 32 foot extension ladder and weld a cheap custom saddle for the top of the proposed wall so that I can get over it. I donโ€™t know who they talked to about the wall design and its efficacy, but it sure as heck wasnโ€™t anybody with any engineering imagination.

Another thing: we are not far from the day where inexpensive drones will be able to pick up and carry someone. This will happen in the next ten years, and itโ€™s folly to think that the coyotes who ferry people over the border wonโ€™t purchase or create them. Theyโ€™re low enough, quiet enough, and small enough to quickly zip people over any wall we could build undetected with our current monitoring setup.

Letโ€™s have border security, by all means, but letโ€™s be smart about it. This is not smart. Itโ€™s not effective. Itโ€™s NOT cheap. The returns will be diminishing as technology advances, too. This is a ridiculous idea that will never be successfully executed and, as such, would be a monumental waste of money.


Originally published by Amy Patrick in a Facebook post for public dissemination.