

Gutting peopleโs basic needs to pay for more tax breaks for the rich.

By Colin Seeberger
Senior Adviser, Communications
The Center for American Progress

By Andrea Ducas
Vice President, Health Policy
The Center for American Progress
Last week, House Republicans released long-awaited tax and budget proposals that would provide the top 5 percent of taxpayers with aboutย $1.5 trillionย in tax breaks. This windfall for the ultrawealthy would be paid for by gutting programs that create American jobs and help Americans afford the cost of basic needs, such as health care and groceries. If enacted, the bill would amount to theย largestย cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in history; kill jobs; and jack up the cost of living in every region of the country. Itโs no wonder a newย analysisย by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) finds that the bill reduces resources for the poorest households while increasing them for the highest earners.
This analysis of the House budget plan includes state and congressional district-level estimates for number of people who would lose health coverage; how many Americans could see at least someโif not allโof their SNAP benefits taken away; and the number of jobs put at risk by eliminating clean energy tax credits if the bill were to become law.
Nationally, the billโalong with additional Trump administration health changesโwould stripย nearlyย 14 millionย Americans of health insurance coverage by 2034. The CBO estimated thatย 8.6 millionย Americans would become uninsuredโprimarily from losing Medicaidโbecause of the Energy and Commerce Committeeโs portions of the bill alone. This number is preliminary and expected to grow. Another 5.1 million Americans would become uninsured because of Congressโ refusal to extend enhanced premium tax credits for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplaces that help people afford their premiums as well as additional regulatory changes proposed by the Trump administration. The implications of these cuts across states are staggering: 1.8 million fewer Floridians and 1.6 million fewer Texans would have coverage by 2034. Coverage losses will exceed 100,000 people in 30 states, and 13 states will see coverage losses at or above 300,000 people.
Similarly, in the case of food assistance,ย nearly 11 million peopleย could see at least some cut in benefits due to expansions to burdensome SNAP paperwork requirements included in the legislation. About 9.2 million of these people would be at risk because,ย for the first time, the plan applies the requirements to families with school-aged children and older Americans. An additionalย 1.6 million peopleย live in areas without enough jobs and would be at risk of losing their benefits entirely from the billโs reductions in flexibility for states to receive waivers from these requirements. Additionally, the legislation proposesย shifting a portion of costsย the federal government currently pays on to states, which could alsoย jeopardize beneficiariesโ SNAP eligibility.
Finally, the House Republicansโ plan to eliminate the Inflation Reduction Actโs clean energy tax credits could put as many asย 686,000 jobsย (both operational and construction) at risk. Since the passage of the clean energy tax credits in August 2022, companies haveย investedย $321 billion in the manufacturing and deployment of clean energy, clean vehicles, electrification of homes and businesses, and carbon management, leading to the creation of more than 2,300 new facilities that created over 300,000 jobs across the country. Anotherย $522 billionย and 686,000 jobs (both operational and construction) have been announced but are still outstanding and are likely to be cancelled if Congress repeals some clean energy tax credits and makes others unusable due to unworkable red tape, as proposed in the House bill.





Rather than working to make health care more accessible and affordable; grocery bills less of a burden; as well as create good-paying American jobs, the House Republican tax and budget proposals would rip away health care, food, and jobs from everyday Americans. This would inflict even more pain on working families grappling with higher prices caused by President Donald Trumpโs tariffs. The American people see this proposal for what it isโa massive transfer of wealth from the working-class to the ultrawealthyโwhich is why Americansย overwhelmingly opposeย gutting peopleโs basic needs to pay for more tax breaks.
READ ENTIRE ARTICLE AT THE CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS


