White evangelicals remain Donald Trump’s most loyal supporters, even as his approval ratings decline across the broader electorate.
By Matthew A. McIntosh
Public Historian
Brewminate
Introduction
White evangelicals continue to stand apart in American politics, remaining Donald Trump’s most loyal constituency even as his approval ratings have fallen across nearly every other major group during his second term. National polling shows that while support for Trump has eroded among independents, suburban voters, young adults, many mainline Protestants, and Catholics, white evangelicals still back him by overwhelming margins. Their loyalty was instrumental in returning him to the White House, and surveys conducted after the election show that a significant share of them believe Trump’s presidency aligns with God’s plan.
This loyalty has created a striking divide among religious Americans. While some faith communities have distanced themselves from Trump, many white evangelical voters continue to frame him as a defender of their values and a necessary force against cultural and political changes they oppose. A portion of this group describes his leadership in explicitly theological terms, attributing his political survival to divine intervention rather than electoral shifts or policy outcomes.
The pattern is not universal across conservative religious traditions. Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who also lean Republican, have consistently shown more skepticism toward Trump. Polls indicate that many Latter-day Saints remain uncomfortable with his behavior and rhetoric, even though a majority still vote GOP. Their caution highlights an internal divide among religious conservatives: shared policy preferences, but sharply different levels of enthusiasm for Trump himself.
As Trump’s broader coalition fractures, the durability of his evangelical support has taken on greater political significance. It reveals not only the strength of his hold on a specific religious bloc, but also the deeper cultural and theological commitments that shape how many white evangelicals interpret political power. That commitment continues to define the landscape of his second term and may shape national politics for years to come.
White Evangelicals and Trump: The Data Behind the Loyalty
Polling throughout Trump’s second term shows that white evangelicals remain the most supportive religious group in the country, often backing him at levels far higher than any other major demographic. Surveys conducted by national research organizations consistently place his favorability among white evangelicals well above his standing among Catholics, mainline Protestants, Black Protestants, Jews, or religiously unaffiliated Americans. This loyalty has held even during moments when broader public approval declined.
Researchers note that the durability of this support reflects patterns established during Trump’s first term. White evangelicals were one of the earliest groups to consolidate behind him, and exit polls from successive elections show that their turnout and overwhelming margins were decisive factors in delivering key battleground states. After the most recent election, multiple post-election surveys confirmed that they again voted for him by large majorities, helping secure his return to the White House.
Several polls highlight another dimension of this loyalty: a significant share of white evangelicals believe Trump’s leadership aligns with God’s will. Surveys by respected research organizations have found measurable support for statements suggesting that Trump’s presidency serves a divine purpose or is part of a broader spiritual plan. This belief is far less common among other religious groups, underscoring the unique theological framing some white evangelicals bring to their political allegiance.
Trump’s relationship with white evangelicals has also been shaped by issue-based alignment. Polls tracking views on the courts, abortion, LGBTQ policy, and religious-liberty debates show that white evangelicals consistently rate these as top political priorities, and Trump has delivered positions or appointments that align with their preferences. This issue alignment reinforces loyalty even during periods when his personal behavior or broader job performance receives criticism from other Americans.
Despite their strong support, polling also indicates small but noticeable shifts at the margins. Younger evangelicals are less consistently supportive, and some surveys show slight declines in approval compared with earlier years. These changes have not altered the overall picture, but they suggest that the bloc is not entirely static. Even with these shifts, white evangelicals remain Trump’s most enduring base of support, standing apart from the broader electorate in both enthusiasm and consistency.
The Religious Framing: Why Some Evangelicals See Trump as Divinely Positioned
A notable share of white evangelicals interpret Trump’s political role through a religious lens, and this framing has become an important part of his continued support. Surveys from major research organizations have found that a portion of white evangelicals believe Trump was chosen by God to lead the country or that his presidency was part of a divine plan. While the exact numbers vary across polls, the presence of this belief has been consistent enough to appear as a distinctive feature of evangelical political identity during both of Trump’s presidencies.
This theological framing has been reinforced by some high-profile evangelical leaders who describe Trump as a defender of Christianity or as someone uniquely equipped to safeguard the nation’s religious heritage. Their messaging often portrays political conflicts as spiritual battles and encourages believers to see Trump’s election victories as signs of divine favor. This kind of rhetoric has helped shape the views of evangelicals who already see cultural change as a threat to their religious identity, making Trump’s leadership feel less like a political preference and more like a religious duty.
Other evangelical voices publicly reject this interpretation, warning that it places political loyalty above Christian teaching. Some pastors, seminary professors, and writers within the evangelical world have argued that framing a political leader as divinely appointed can distort Christian theology and undermine the church’s ability to speak independently about moral issues. Their critiques highlight an internal struggle within evangelicalism between believers who see Trump as spiritually significant and those who see that framing as theologically irresponsible.
Even with these internal disagreements, the perception of Trump as spiritually aligned with evangelical interests remains a powerful force. For many white evangelicals who accept this view, his political controversies and declining national approval ratings carry less weight than the belief that he plays a special role in protecting their culture and values. This religious interpretation continues to shape how segments of the evangelical electorate understand their political commitments, reinforcing loyalty that has endured through two presidential terms.
Mormons: A Conservative Group with a Different Relationship to Trump
Latter-day Saints are one of the most reliably conservative religious groups in the United States, but their relationship with Trump has never mirrored the overwhelming loyalty seen among white evangelicals. Polling throughout both of Trump’s presidencies shows that Mormons generally support Republican candidates, yet their favorable views of Trump consistently fall below those of white evangelicals. This gap has persisted even when Mormon voters strongly align with Republican positions on social and cultural issues.
Surveys conducted during Trump’s campaigns and administrations show that many Latter-day Saints express discomfort with his personal conduct, public rhetoric, and approach to political leadership. These reservations have appeared repeatedly in polling, where Mormon respondents register lower enthusiasm for Trump compared with other conservative Christian groups. Analysts often point to the strong emphasis within Latter-day Saint teachings on personal character, integrity, and moral discipline as one reason for this distinction.
Despite these concerns, most Latter-day Saints continue to vote Republican in national elections. Polls from 2016 through 2024 consistently showed that majorities supported Trump at the ballot box, even if their favorability ratings lagged behind. This pattern reflects a divide between political preference and personal approval: many Latter-day Saints prefer Republican policies but remain wary of Trump himself, creating a more complicated form of support than the near-unconditional backing he receives from white evangelicals.
This dynamic has made Latter-day Saints one of the few conservative religious groups that both support Trump electorally and voice significant reservations about his leadership. Their mixed views highlight the diversity within religious conservatism and underscore that Trump’s strongest backing is not universal across Christian traditions. In contrast to the theological framing adopted by some evangelical voters, Mormon attitudes reflect a more pragmatic, policy-driven calculation, one that supports the party but hesitates to embrace the man at its center.
Cracks in the Foundation: Where Trump Is Losing Ground
Trump’s support among white evangelicals remains strong, but recent polls show small signs of erosion as his second term progresses. National surveys report declining approval ratings across the general population, and although evangelicals continue to back him at higher rates than any other major group, their numbers have slipped modestly compared with earlier years. Younger evangelicals in particular show more mixed views, with some distancing themselves from Trump’s rhetoric and questioning the fusion of faith and partisan identity that defined his earlier campaigns.
These shifts, while limited, have also been reflected in statements from evangelical institutions, pastors, and writers who have urged believers to reconsider their alignment with Trump. Several prominent evangelicals have publicly warned that the movement surrounding him risks overshadowing core theological commitments, and some congregations have chosen to avoid direct political involvement altogether. Their voices remain a minority, but they illustrate a growing discomfort among Christians who once supported Trump without hesitation.
The overall picture still favors Trump, yet the presence of dissenting leaders, younger voters with different priorities, and modest declines in polling suggest that his hold on white evangelicals is not entirely unshakable. These subtle changes have not transformed the political landscape, but they show that even within his most loyal religious bloc, enthusiasm is no longer uniform. As approval ratings fall nationwide, the durability of evangelical support will shape how much political insulation Trump retains in the years ahead.
The Cult Framing and Its Critics
As Trump’s bond with white evangelicals has strengthened, scholars and commentators have increasingly described the relationship using language associated with cult dynamics. Political scientists and sociologists point to behaviors such as unwavering loyalty, resistance to negative information, and the elevation of a political leader to near-spiritual status. These observations appear in analyses published by mainstream outlets and academic institutions, which note that some evangelical supporters treat Trump as a figure whose authority should not be questioned. The comparison is not universal, but it has become a recurring theme in discussions about his religious backing.
Supporters who reject that framing argue that the term “cult” oversimplifies a deeper set of political and cultural commitments. They say evangelical loyalty reflects shared views on the courts, religious liberty debates, and long-standing concerns about cultural change rather than adherence to a charismatic figure. Some scholars caution that using the term “cult” can obscure the political factors that shape white evangelical identity, making the alliance appear more mysterious than it is. They warn that dismissing millions of voters with a single label can hinder understanding rather than improving it.
Even with these objections, the “cult” framing persists because certain elements within the evangelical movement have embraced rhetoric that blurs the line between faith and political devotion. Public events, rallies, and media networks supportive of Trump sometimes portray him as a divinely protected figure or as a leader engaged in a spiritual battle for the nation. Analysts studying these phenomena describe them as examples of political religiosity, in which partisan identity becomes intertwined with spiritual language and symbolism. These patterns help explain why the cult comparison has gained traction in public discourse.
At the same time, many evangelical leaders reject such rhetoric outright. Pastors, writers, and theologians within the tradition caution that elevating a political figure to a quasi-religious status violates core Christian teachings. They emphasize that Christian belief centers on spiritual authority rather than political loyalty, and they warn that conflating the two risks compromising the integrity of both faith and civic life. Their critiques highlight the tension within evangelicalism between those who spiritualize Trump’s leadership and those who view that language as theologically inappropriate.
The debate over whether Trump’s evangelical support resembles a cult reflects larger questions about the role of religion in American politics. For critics, the comparison underscores the intensity of evangelical loyalty and the difficulty of shifting opinions within the group. For supporters and scholars who reject the label, the focus should be on understanding the social, political, and cultural forces that bind white evangelicals to Trump. Either way, the disagreement reveals how deeply the former president has shaped religious identity in ways that extend far beyond conventional political alignment.
Why the Majority Still Stands with Trump
Despite shifts at the margins, the core reasons for Trump’s sustained support among white evangelicals remain consistent and well documented. Polling across multiple national surveys shows that this group prioritizes issues such as Supreme Court appointments, abortion restrictions, religious liberty protections, and opposition to cultural changes involving gender and sexuality. Trump aligned closely with these priorities during both of his presidencies, creating a durable connection between his political agenda and the concerns evangelicals consistently rank as most important.
Support for Trump is also reinforced by the media environment that shapes evangelical political views. Research from universities and national survey centers has shown that many white evangelicals rely heavily on conservative Christian media networks, talk radio programs, and social media channels that frame Trump as a defender of their interests. These outlets often portray political conflicts as existential battles for religious identity, which strengthens loyalty and makes believers more resistant to messages from outside their preferred media sources.
Another powerful factor is the perception of cultural threat. Surveys repeatedly show that many white evangelicals believe Christianity is losing influence in American society and that they are viewed unfairly by the broader culture. Trump’s rhetoric about protecting Christians, reshaping the courts, and resisting secular or progressive policies directly addresses these anxieties. For many evangelical voters, supporting him is not only a political choice but also a way to push back against cultural changes they see as threatening their values.
These motivations help explain why white evangelicals remain more unified behind Trump than any other major religious group. Their loyalty is grounded in a combination of policy alignment, cultural identity, and media reinforcement that continues to shape how they interpret national politics. Even as Trump loses support elsewhere, these dynamics keep his evangelical base firmly in place and maintain their role as a defining force in his political strength.
Conclusion: A Movement at a Crossroads
White evangelicals remain Donald Trump’s most loyal supporters, even as his approval ratings decline across the broader electorate. Their continued backing reflects a mix of theological framing, cultural anxiety, and policy alignment that no other religious group has embraced to the same degree. While some evangelicals have pulled away and younger generations show signs of shifting views, the core bloc remains intact and highly influential.
This loyalty has reshaped the relationship between religion and politics in the United States. Trump’s appeal to white evangelicals has elevated their concerns to the center of national debate and encouraged a political style that blends cultural grievance with religious language. At the same time, dissenting evangelical voices warn that this alliance risks compromising the church’s integrity and weakening its ability to speak independently about moral and civic issues.
The divide within religious America is now a defining feature of Trump’s second term. Whether white evangelical support remains stable or begins to fracture will shape not only the future of his presidency, but also the role Christian identity plays in American public life. The direction this movement takes will influence how the nation understands faith, power, and politics for years to come.
Originally published by Brewminate, 12.05.2025, under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
About the Author
