

Officials report threats and a need for more support at the federal and local levels.

By Ruby Edlin
Research and Program Associate, Democracy
Brennan Center for Justice

By Turquoise Baker
Research & Program Associate, Democracy
Brennan Center for Justice
As Amerยญican demoยญcracy finds itself under assault from lies about the 2020 presยญidยญenยญtial race being โstolen, โ elecยญtion offiยญcials are a prime target in the attempt to underยญmine future elecยญtions. In 2020, in the face of a pandemic, record-high turnout, and a flood of disinยญformยญaยญtion about the elecยญtion process and its integยญrity, these offiยญcials managed to run โthe most secure elecยญtion in Amerยญican history.โ
But now, a new Brenยญnan Center poll of local elecยญtion offiยญcials around the counยญtry shows how damaging the sustained attacks against them and their colleagues have been, putting apolitยญical elecยญtion adminยญisยญtraยญtion and our demoยญcratic system in seriยญous danger. Here are some key findยญings from the survey.
Elecยญtion offiยญcials are facing threats, and safety concerns are in part why some have left their jobs.
One in six elecยญtion offiยญcials have experยญiยญenced threats because of their job, and 77 percent say that they feel these threats have increased in recent years. Ranging from death threats that name offiยญcialsโ young chilยญdren to racist and gendered harassยญment, these attacks have forced elecยญtion offiยญcials across the counยญtry to take steps like hiring personal securยญity, fleeยญing their homes, and putting their chilยญdren into counยญselยญing.
As elecยญtion workยญers attempt to keep our demoยญcracy afloat amidst these condiยญtions, over half of poll respondยญents reporยญted that they are concerned about the safety of their colleagues. More than one in four are concerned about being assaulยญted on the job.

Underยญstandยญably, some elecยญtion workยญers have decided these threats are too high a risk: 30 percent of the offiยญcials in our poll know of one or more elecยญtion workยญers who have left at least in part because of because of fear for their safety, increased threats, or intimยญidยญaยญtion. In the long term, 60 percent of offiยญcials are concerned that threats, harassยญment, and intimยญidยญaยญtion against local elecยญtion offiยญcials will make it diffiยญcult to retain and recruit elecยญtion workยญers. Elecยญtion offiยญcials and staff have a heavy workยญload with a slew of tasks that must be reguยญlarly underยญtaken and expertยญise that must be developed โ combined with limited staff and resources. Recruitยญing and retenยญtion chalยญlenges would further burden these offices.
Most elecยญtion offiยญcials like their jobs, with three in four agreeยญing that they find โreal enjoyยญmentโ in their roles. However, 20 percent plan to leave before the 2024 elecยญtion, with one-third of those citing politยญical leadยญersโ attacks on a system they know is fair and honest as one of their top reasยญons for leavยญing. And nearly one-third cite unneยญcesยญsary stress as one of their top reasยญons for leavยญing.
Elecยญtion offiยญcials fear that conspirยญacy theorยญies will infect adminยญisยญtraยญtion and are worried about politยญical interยญferยญence.
As conspirยญacy theorยญies continue to grip a signiยญficยญant portion of the electยญorยญate, over half of elecยญtion offiยญcials are concerned that some incomยญing elecยญtion offiยญcials might believe there was wideยญspread voter fraud during the 2020 elecยญtions.
As elecยญtion offiยญcials work hard to repeat the successes of the 2020 elecยญtion, nearly two-thirds of them reporยญted being worried about politยญical leadยญers interยญferยญing in how they do their jobs in future elecยญtions. Since the 2020 vote, partisan actors have interfered with apolitยญical elecยญtion adminยญisยญtraยญtion as part of the broader elecยญtion sabotยญage moveยญment. For example, states have passed laws that allow partisยญans to seize control of elecยญtion adminยญisยญtraยญtion and crimยญinยญally punish elecยญtion offiยญcials for minor infracยญtions.
Further, nearly one in five local elecยญtion offiยญcials are concerned about facing presยญsure to certify elecยญtion results in favor of a specific candidยญate or party.
Elecยญtion offiยญcials are particยญuยญlarly unhappy with support provided by the federal governยญment.
Nearly 80 percent of elecยญtion offiยญcials think the federal governยญment is either doing nothยญing to support them or taking some steps but not doing enough. While Congress has provided cash-strapped state and local elecยญtion offices with some support in recent years, that has represยญenยญted a fracยญtion of what is needed. Although they feel the most support at the local level, nearly a third of local elecยญtion offiยญcials still feel that their local governยญment could be doing more to support them.
The poll also shows that the Justice Departยญmentโs Elecยญtion Threats Task Force, which investยญigยญates and prosecยญutes threats against elecยญtion offiยญcials, has work to do when it comes to reachยญing elecยญtion offiยญcials and local law enforceยญment. Ninety percent of elecยญtion offiยญcials never heard of or didnโt know much about the task force. After hearยญing about it, 57 percent were someยญwhat or very confidยญent that it would make them feel safer.

Itโs clear that the Departยญment of Justice should conduct more outreach to local elecยญtion offiยญcials. It should also increase coordinยญaยญtion with local law enforceยญment, who receive the majorยญity of threat reports, accordยญing to our poll. Only a fracยญtion of local elecยญtion offiยญcials who have been threatened because of their job reporยญted the threat to law enforceยญment, but 89 percent of those who did reporยญted it to local law enforceยญment.
Social media is seen as a major contribยญutor to probยญlems.
Over three in four local elecยญtion offiยญcials think that social media companยญies havenโt done enough to stop the spread of false informยญaยญtion, and over one in three of those who experยญiยญenced threats have been threatened over social media.
Answerยญing quesยญtions from voters who have been misled by inacยญcurยญate elecยญtion informยญaยญtion can be overยญwhelmยญing and time-consumยญing, strainยญing elecยญtion offiยญcials and their staff. Social media companยญies should do more to promote accurยญate informยญaยญtion over false informยญaยญtion and work directly with elecยญtion offiยญcials to address pressยญing concerns.
These poll results should raise the alarm for anyone who cares about profesยญsional, apolitยญical elecยญtion adminยญisยญtraยญtion, espeยญcially because theyโre coming from the people who know it best. All levels of governยญment must act to protect our elecยญtions and the people who run them.
Originally published by the Brennan Center for Justice, 03.10.2022, under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs-NonCommercial license.


