

The figure of the fool from the medieval era.

By Julia Binswanger
Freelance Journalist and Audio Producer
While the fool is often associated with the Middle Ages, the figureโs role evolved a great deal in the centuries that followed. Now, an exhibition at the Louvre in Paris is celebrating the complex character, following the foolโs dance through art history.
Titled โFigures of the Fool: From the Middle Ages to the Romantics,โ the show features eight sections that examine the fool in different contextsโsuch as โIn the Beginning: The Fool and God,โ โThe Fool and Love,โ โThe Fool at Courtโ and โFools in the Cityโโto teach visitors how the character changed with the times.

โThe figure of the fool walked off the margins of medieval manuscripts into the unholy courts of the Renaissance, then returned to the page as Hamletโs Yorick,โ writes the Wall Street Journalโs Dominic Green. โLater, in the age of reason and democracy, the parodist of royal dignity became a mirror of the universal condition: Dostoevskyโs โholy foolโ and Picassoโs grubby clowns; Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy.โ
Museumgoers can peruse more than 300 pieces of art from 90 European and American institutions. These items follow the fool across hundreds of years, beginning in the Middle Ages and ending in the 19th century.
โSuch characters appear in architectural adornments, frescoes, tapestries, etchings, ceramics and ivory or carved-wood miniatures, or in chess sets as an alternative to the bishop,โ writes Artforumโs Charlotte Kent. โFools came from all social strata. One drawing has them falling from trees; an anonymous Netherlandish oil on panel shows fools hatching from eggs beneath an enormous chicken.โ

Later depictions often portray the fool as someone to relate to rather than someone to mock. As the Louvre explains on theย exhibition website, the character โbecame a figure with which artists identified, wondering: โWhat if I were the fool?โโ
Many of the fools in the exhibition wear bright, colorful outfits and evoke a sense of levity. But many others donโt fit this stereotype, appearing morose or burdened.
In Jan Matejkoโs 1862 depiction of Staลczyk, a famous Polish court jester, the figure sits slumped over in a chair, โhaving just discoveredโpresumably indicated by papers on the tableโthat the Polish city of Smolensk has been lost (1514) during war with Moscow,โ per Encyclopedia Britannica. Behind him, the rest of the court enjoys a ball.

โThe fool allows for a figurative representation of questions troubling society,โ Elisabeth Antoine-Kรถnig, one of the exhibitionโs curators, tells ArtnetโsDevorah Lauter. She adds that the fool is โone thing and its opposite, he is the rejected marginalized figure, and the one who unites us and bears the ridicule and anger of others.โ
These days, most of us donโt want to be called a fool. Still, the exhibitionโs curators think modern audiences have a lot to learn from the character. โI feel that the figure of the fool, as it existed in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, is lacking today, in helping us face the crises we are experiencing,โ Antoine-Kรถnig adds.
Originally published by Smithsonian Magazine, 01.08.2025, reprinted with permission under a Creative Commons license for educational, non-commercial purposes.


