I Thought the GOP was AGAINST Big Government

BrewBannerOriginal


© 2015 Hart Williams

© 2015 Hart Williams


We ought to be chilled. Instead, this will be cast into another “us versus them” bit of minor pettifoggery, while the intent to use government as a tool of political vendetta looms large already, without a Trump presidency that would almost undoubtedly be partially devoted to settling all and any scores, old and new.


By Hart Williams / 05.11.2016

ModerateVoice02

The Senate Commerce Committee has demanded that Facebook ‘splain themselves in the face of reports that conservatives were being picked on, er, censored, er, whatever. As in: for all their screeching about “Second Amendment” rights, the First Amendment continues to elude them.

Senate GOP Launches Inquiry Into Facebook’s News Curation
Michael Nunez / Gizmodo:

The US Senate Commerce Committee—which has jurisdiction over media issues, consumer protection issues, and internet communication—has sent a letter to Mark Zuckerberg requesting answers to questions it has on its trending topics section….

Yes, Virginia, it’s entirely true, and the first paragraph makes it even stranger (via Gizmodo):

FB02

Click Image to Enlarge

The very simple issue here is this: What business does the US Senate have in controlling the speech policies of a PRIVATE ENTERPRISE? And if political bias in media is so awful and terrible, why hasn’t the Commerce Committee convened any hearings on Hugh Hewitt or Rush Limbaugh, or Michael Savage or Alex Jones, to name a few, and whose RADIO operations fall under the Commerce Department FAR more than Facebook does. Where are the questions about the institutional bias on Faux Nooz™?

Indeed, how hypocritical will it be when GOP Senators GO on Faux Nooz™ to complain that Facebook might be SUPPRESSING conservative “thought”?

FB03

Worse, no one will even notice the fundamental cognitive dissonance of that act, just as no one comments on the fundamental congnitive dissonance of being proud to be from “red” states and talking about turning the map “red” while screeching that Bernie Sanders is a (gasp) Commie! A Red!

You see what I’m getting at here?

There is no legitimate governance issue here, but there is a crucial political battle to be won; just as there is no legitimate governance issue in the Select Committee on Benghazi, but there is a clear (thanks to Republicans slipping up and actually telling the truth for a change) political advantage to be gained.

FB04

And they wonder why their base rejected sixteen classic Republican candidates, governors and senators all, preferring to smell the pure, unadulterated aroma of bovine fecal matter instead?

FB05

Because, even if you stipulated that Facebook was doing WHATEVER they are accused of doing (putting their liberal thumbs on the “trending” scales, as near as I can make out) …

FB06

Click Image to Enlarge

…this is still nothing more than a blatant attempt to manipulate free speech and (it would seem) to hopefully bully Facebook into bending over backwards to placate “conservatives” who are nothing of the sort, if words have any actual meaning.

We ought to be chilled. Instead, this will be cast into another “us versus them” bit of minor pettifoggery, while the intent to use government as a tool of political vendetta looms large already, without a Trump presidency that would almost undoubtedly be partially devoted to settling all and any scores, old and new.

FB07

Click Image to Enlarge

Where is that eschewing of “big government” now, Mr. Chairman?

This is, at best, intimidation, and, at worst, a blatant attempt to push conservative “news” and “trending” topics, as seen from the Republican Senate of Mitch McConnell.

FB08

Senator Joseph McCarthy

And it is shameful, no matter which party you belong to or don’t.

Comments

comments