A ‘Measure of Retaliation’: The Burning of Washington in 1814


Burning of Washington, Paul de Thoyras. / Wikimedia Commons

President James Madison, military officials, and his government evacuated and were able to find refuge for the night.


Curated/Reviewed by Matthew A. McIntosh
Public Historian
Brewminate

Introduction

The Burning of Washington was a British invasion of Washington City (now Washington, D.C.), the capital of the United States, during the Chesapeake Campaign of the War of 1812. To this date, it remains the only time since the American Revolutionary War that a foreign power has captured and occupied the capital of the United States.

Following the defeat of American forces at the Battle of Bladensburg on August 24, 1814, a British force led by Major General Robert Ross marched to Washington. That night, British forces set fire to multiple government and military buildings, including the White House (then called the Presidential Mansion), the Capitol building, as well as other facilities of the U.S. government.[3] The attack was in part a retaliation for the recent American destruction of Port Dover in Upper Canada, as well as American forces burning and looting the capital of Upper Canada the previous year.[4] Less than a day after the attack began, a heavy thunderstorm —possibly a hurricane — and a tornado extinguished the fires. The occupation of Washington lasted for roughly 26 hours, and what the British plans were beyond the damage are still a subject of debate.

President James Madison, military officials, and his government evacuated and were able to find refuge for the night in Brookeville, a small town in Montgomery County, Maryland; President Madison spent the night in the house of Caleb Bentley, a Quaker who lived and worked in Brookeville. Bentley’s house, known today as the Madison House, still exists. Following the storm, the British returned to their ships, many of which required repairs due to the storm.

Catalysts

The British government, already at war with Napoleonic France, adopted a defensive strategy against the United States when the Americans declared war in 1812. Reinforcements were held back from Canada and reliance was instead made on local militias and native allies to bolster the British Army in Canada. However, after the defeat and exile of Napoleon Bonaparte in April 1814, Britain was able to use its now available troops and ships to prosecute its war with the United States. The Earl of Bathurst, Secretary of State for War and the Colonies, dispatched an army brigade and additional naval vessels to Bermuda, from where a blockade of the US coast and even the occupation of some coastal islands had been overseen throughout the war. It was decided to use these forces in raids along the Atlantic seaboard to draw American forces away from Canada.[5]

British and American movements during the Chesapeake Campaign 1814. / Wikimedia Commons

The commanders were under strict orders, however, not to carry out operations far inland, or to attempt to hold territory. Early in 1814, Vice Admiral Sir Alexander Cochrane had been appointed Commander-in-Chief of the Royal Navy’s North America and West Indies Station, controlling naval forces based at the new Bermuda dockyard and the Halifax Naval Yard which were used to blockade US Atlantic ports throughout the war. He planned to carry the war into the United States by attacks in Virginia and against New Orleans.[6]

Rear Admiral George Cockburn had commanded the squadron in Chesapeake Bay since the previous year. On June 25, he wrote to Cochrane stressing that the defenses there were weak, and he felt that several major cities were vulnerable to attack.[7] Cochrane suggested attacking Baltimore, Washington, and Philadelphia. Rear Admiral Cockburn accurately predicted that “within a short period of time, with enough force, we could easily have at our mercy the capital”.[8] He had recommended Washington as the target, because of the comparative ease of attacking the national capital and “the greater political effect likely to result”.[9]

Admiralty House, Mount Wyndham, Bermuda, where the attack was planned. / Wikimedia Commons

Major General Ross commanded the 4,500-man army in Washington, composed of the 4th (King’s Own) Regiment of Foot, 21st (Royal North British Fusilier) Regiment of Foot, 44th (East Essex) Regiment of Foot, and 85th Regiment of Foot.

An added motive was retaliation for what Britain saw as the “wanton destruction of private property along the north shores of Lake Erie” by American forces under Col. John Campbell in May, the most notable being the Raid on Port Dover.[10] On June 2, Sir George Prévost, Governor General of British North America wrote to Cochrane at Admiralty House, in Bailey’s Bay, Bermuda, calling for a retaliation against the American destruction of private property in violation of the laws of war. Prévost argued that,

… in consequence of the late disgraceful conduct of the American troops in the wanton destruction of private property on the north shores of Lake Erie, in order that if the war with the United States continues you may, should you judge it advisable, assist in inflicting that measure of retaliation which shall deter the enemy from a repetition of similar outrages.[10]

Many sources also suggest that the attack on Washington was motivated by revenge for the attack on York,[11] now, the city of Toronto, Ontario, on the shore of Lake Ontario during the Battle of York in April 1813. Research completed by the Washington Post, however rebuts that claim. “The earlier arson of parliament buildings in York was not raised as a justification until months later, after the British faced criticism at home and abroad for burning buildings in Washington”. Earlier, the British had filed complaints only about the “wanton destruction” along the Niagara region and Lake Erie.[12]

On July 18, Cochrane ordered Cockburn to “deter the enemy from a repetition of similar outrages  … You are hereby required and directed to destroy and lay waste such towns and districts as you may find assailable”.[13] Cochrane instructed, “You will spare merely the lives of the unarmed inhabitants of the United States”. Ross and Cockburn surveyed the torching of the President’s Mansion, during which time a great storm arose unexpectedly out of the southeast. They were confronted a number of times while on horseback by older women from around Washington City and elderly clergymen (Southern Presbyterian and Southern Baptist), with women and children who had been hiding in homes and churches. They requested protection from abuse and robbery by enlisted personnel from the British Expeditionary Forces whom they accused of having tried to ransack private homes and other buildings. Major-General Ross had two British soldiers put in chains for violation of his general order.

Events

Burning of Washington, August 1814. / Library of Congress, Wikimedia Commons

President James Madison, members of his government, and the military fled the city in the wake of the British victory at the Battle of Bladensburg. They eventually found refuge for the night in Brookeville, a small town in Montgomery County, Maryland, which is known today as the “United States’ Capital for a Day.” President Madison spent the night in the house of Caleb Bentley, a Quaker who lived and worked as a silversmith in Brookeville. Bentley’s house, known today as the Madison House, still stands in Brookeville.[14]

The sappers and miners of the Corps of Royal Engineers under Captain Blanshard were employed in burning the principal buildings. Blanshard reported that it seemed that the American President was so sure that the attacking force would be made prisoners that a handsome entertainment had been prepared. Blanshard and his sappers enjoyed the feast.[15]:358

On August 24, 1814, British troops led by Major General Robert Ross, accompanied by Rear Admiral George Cockburn, attacked the capital city with a force of 4,500 “battle hardened” men. .[16] [17] The plan to attack Washington had been formulated by Rear Admiral Cockburn, who predicted that “within a short period of time, with enough force, we could easily have at our mercy the capital”.[18] Major General Ross commanded the troops, and was less optimistic.[19] While Cockburn recommended burning the entire city, Ross planned to damage only public buildings.[20][21]

U.S. Capitol

The United States Capitol after the burning of Washington, D.C. in the War of 1812. Watercolor and ink depiction from 1814, restored. / Library of Congress, Wikimedia Commons

The Capitol was, according to some contemporary travelers, the only building in Washington “worthy to be noticed”.[22] Thus, it was a prime target for the British invaders, for both its aesthetic and its symbolic value. Upon arrival into the city via Maryland Avenue, the British targeted the Capitol (first the southern wing, containing the House of Representatives, then the northern wing, containing the Senate).[23] Prior to setting it aflame, the British looted the building (which at that time housed Congress, the Library of Congress, and the Supreme Court).

Items looted by troops led by Rear-Admiral Cockburn included a ledger entitled “An account of the receipts and expenditures of the United States for the year 1810”; the admiral wrote on the inside leaf that it was “taken in President’s room in the Capitol, at the destruction of that building by the British, on the capture of Washington, 24th August, 1814”. He later gave it to his elder brother Sir James Cockburn, 9th Baronet, the Governor of Bermuda. The book was eventually returned to the Library of Congress in 1940.[24]

The British intended to burn the building to the ground. They set fire to the southern wing first. The flames grew so quickly that the British were prevented from collecting enough wood to burn the stone walls completely. However, the Library of Congress’s contents in the northern wing contributed to the flames on that side.[25] Among the items destroyed was the 3,000-volume collection of the Library of Congress[26] and the intricate decorations of the neoclassical columns, pediments, and sculptures[27] originally designed by William Thornton in 1793 and Benjamin Latrobe in 1803.[28] The wooden ceilings and floors burned, and the glass skylights melted because of the intense heat.[25] The building was not a complete loss; the House rotunda, the east lobby, the staircases, and Latrobe’s famous Corn-Cob Columns in the Senate entrance hall all survived.[25] The Superintendent of the Public Buildings of the City of Washington, Thomas Munroe, concluded that the loss to the Capitol amounted to $787,163.28, with $457,388.36 for the North wing and main building, and $329,774.92 for the South wing.[29]

White House

The White House ruins after the conflagration of August 24, 1814. Watercolor by George Munger, displayed at the White House. / Wikimedia Commons

After burning the Capitol, the British turned northwest up Pennsylvania Avenue toward the White House. After US government officials and President Madison fled the city, the First LadyDolley Madison received a letter from her husband, urging her to be prepared to leave Washington at a moment’s notice.[30] Dolley organized the enslaved and other staff to save valuables from the British.[31] James Madison’s personal enslaved attendant, the fifteen-year-old boy Paul Jennings, was an eyewitness.[32] After later buying his freedom from the widow Dolley Madison, Jennings published his memoir in 1865, considered the first from the White House:

It has often been stated in print, that when Mrs. Madison escaped from the White House, she cut out from the frame the large portrait of Washington (now in one of the parlors there), and carried it off. She had no time for doing it. It would have required a ladder to get it down. All she carried off was the silver in her reticule, as the British were thought to be but a few squares off, and were expected any moment.[33]

Jennings said the people who saved the painting and removed the objects actually were:

John Susé (Jean Pierre Sioussat, the French door-keeper, and still living at the time of Jennings’s memoir) and Magraw [McGraw], the President’s gardener, took it down and sent it off on a wagon, with some large silver urns and such other valuables as could be hastily got hold of. When the British did arrive, they ate up the very dinner, and drank the wines, &c., that I had prepared for the President’s party.[33][34][35]

Major-General Robert Ross, British commander who led the attack on Washington. / Wikimedia Commons

The soldiers burned the president’s house, and fuel was added to the fires that night to ensure they would continue burning into the next day.[36]

In 2009, President Barack Obama held a ceremony at the White House to honor Jennings as a representative of his contributions to saving the Gilbert Stuart painting and other valuables. (The painting that was saved was a copy Stuart made of the painting, not the original,[37] although it is the same one on display in the East Room.) “A dozen descendants of Jennings came to Washington, to visit the White House. They looked at the painting their relative helped save.”[38] In an interview with National Public Radio, Jennings’ great-great-grandson Hugh Alexander said, “We were able to take a family portrait in front of the painting, which was for me one of the high points.”[32] He confirmed that Jennings later purchased his freedom from the widowed Dolley Madison.[32]

Other Washington Properties

Portrait of Admiral Cockburn at the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich, with Washington burning in the background. The U.S. Capitol and Treasury Building are at far right. / Royal Museums Greenwich, Wikimedia Commons

The day after the destruction of the White House, Rear Admiral Cockburn entered the building of the D.C. newspaper, the National Intelligencer, intending to burn it down. However, several women persuaded him not to because they were afraid the fire would spread to their neighboring houses. Cockburn wanted to destroy the newspaper because its reporters had written so negatively about him, branding him “The Ruffian”. Instead, he ordered his troops to tear the building down brick by brick, and ordered all the “C” type destroyed “so that the rascals can have no further means of abusing my name”.[39]

The US Treasury Building (built 1804). / Wikimedia Commons

The British sought out the United States Treasury in hopes of finding money or items of worth, but they found only old records.[26] They burned the United States Treasury and other public buildings. The United States Department of War building was also burned. However, the War and State Department files had been removed, so the books and records had been saved; the only records of the War Department lost were recommendations of appointments for the Army and letters received from seven years earlier.[40]

The Blodget Hotel which housed the US Patent Office; spared during the burning of Washington in 1814. The Patent Office later burned in 1836. / Library of Congress, Wikimedia Commons

The First U.S. Patent Office Building was saved by the efforts of William Thornton, the former Architect of the Capitol and then the Superintendent of Patents, who gained British cooperation to preserve it.[41] “When the smoke cleared from the dreadful attack, the Patent Office was the only Government building … left untouched” in Washington.[42]

The Americans had already burned much of the historic Washington Navy Yard, founded by Thomas Jefferson, to prevent capture of stores and ammunition,[43] as well as the 44-gun frigate USS Columbia and the 22 gun USS Argus, both new vessels nearing completion.[44] The Navy Yard’s Latrobe Gate, Quarters A, and Quarters B were the only buildings to escape destruction.[45][46] Also spared were the Marine Barracks and Commandant’s House, although several private properties were damaged or destroyed.[47]

In the afternoon of August 25, General Ross sent two hundred men to secure a fort on Greenleaf’s Point. The fort, later known as Fort McNair, had already been destroyed by the Americans, but 150 barrels of gunpowder remained. While the British were trying to destroy it by dropping the barrels into a well, the powder ignited. As many as thirty men were killed in the explosion, and many others were maimed.[48]

“The Storm that Saved Washington”

The Washington Navy Yard in 1862. / Naval Historical Center, Wikimedia Commons

Less than four days after the attack began, a sudden, very heavy thunderstorm—possibly a hurricane—put out the fires. It also spun off a tornado that passed through the center of the capital, setting down on Constitution Avenue[49] and lifting two cannons before dropping them several yards away and killing British troops and American civilians alike.[50] Following the storm, the British troops returned to their ships, many of which were badly damaged. There is some debate regarding the effect of this storm on the occupation. While some assert that the storm forced their retreat,[49] it seems likely from their destructive and arsonous actions before the storm, and their written orders from Cochrane to “destroy and lay waste”,[51] that their intention was merely to raze the city, rather than occupy it for an extended period. It is also clear that commander Robert Ross never intended to damage private buildings as had been recommended by Cockburn and Alexander Cochrane.[52]

Whatever the case, the British occupation of Washington lasted only about 26 hours. Despite this, the “Storm that saved Washington”, as it became known, did the opposite according to some. The rains sizzled and cracked the already charred walls of the White House and ripped away at structures the British had no plans to destroy (such as the Patent Office). The storm may have exacerbated an already dire situation for Washington D.C.

An encounter was noted between Sir George Cockburn and a female resident of Washington. “Dear God! Is this the weather to which you are accustomed in this infernal country?” enquired the Admiral. “This is a special interposition of Providence to drive our enemies from our city”, the woman allegedly called out to Cockburn. “Not so, Madam”, Cockburn retorted. “It is rather to aid your enemies in the destruction of your city”, before riding off on horseback.[53]

The Royal Navy reported that it lost one man killed and six wounded in the attack, of whom the fatality and three of the wounded were from the Corps of Colonial Marines.[54]

The destruction of the Capitol, including the Senate House and the House of Representatives, the Arsenal, Dockyard, Treasury, War Office, President’s mansion, bridge over the Potomac, a frigate and a sloop together with all Materiel was estimated at £365,000.[15]:359

A separate British force captured Alexandria, on the south side of the Potomac River, while Ross’s troops were leaving Washington. The mayor of Alexandria made a deal and the British refrained from burning the town.[55]

President Madison returned to Washington by September 1, on which date he issued a proclamation calling on citizens to defend the District of Columbia.[56] Congress returned and assembled in special session on September 19. Due to the destruction of the Capitol and other public buildings, they initially met in the Post and Patent Office building.[57]

Aftermath

Most contemporary American observers, including newspapers representing anti-war Federalists, condemned the destruction of the public buildings as needless vandalism.[58] Many in the British public were shocked by the burning of the Capitol and other buildings at Washington; such actions were denounced by most leaders of continental Europe, where capital cities had been repeatedly occupied in the course of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars but always spared destruction (at least on the part of the occupiers – the famous burning of Moscow that occurred less than two years prior had been an act carried out by the defenders). According to The Annual Register, the burning had “brought a heavy censure on the British character”, with some members of Parliament, including the anti-establishment MP Samuel Whitbread,[58] joining in the criticism.

The majority of British opinion believed that the burnings were justified following the damage that United States forces had done with its incursions into Canada. In addition, they noted that the United States had been the aggressor, declaring war and initiating it.[59] Several commentators regarded the damages as just revenge for the American destruction of the Parliament buildings and other public buildings in York, the provincial capital of Upper Canada, early in 1813. Sir George Prévost wrote that “as a just retribution, the proud capital at Washington has experienced a similar fate”.[60] The Reverend John Strachan, who as Rector of York had witnessed the American acts there, wrote to Thomas Jefferson that the damage to Washington “was a small retaliation after redress had been refused for burnings and depredations, not only of public but private property, committed by them in Canada”.[61]

When they ultimately returned to Bermuda, the British forces took with them two pairs of portraits of King George III and his wife, Queen Charlotte, which had been discovered in one of the public buildings. One pair currently hangs in the House of Assembly of the Parliament of Bermuda, and the other in the Cabinet Building, both in the city of Hamilton.[62][63]

Reconstruction

The Old Brick Capitol serving as a prison during the Civil War. / Wikimedia Commons

Although the President and military officers returned to Washington only a few days after the British left, Congress did not return for three and half weeks.[64] The Thirteenth Congress officially convened on September 19, at the Blodgett’s Hotel, one of the few surviving buildings large enough to hold all members.[65] The Blodgett’s Hotel also housed the U.S. Patent Office. Although the British had destroyed all public buildings, the Blodgett’s Hotel and U.S. Patent Office were spared.[66] It was in this building that Congress met between September and December 1815 (when construction of the Old Brick Capitol was complete).[67]

There was a movement in Congress to relocate the capital after the burning. Congressmen from the North pushed for relocation to Philadelphia or other prominent northern cities, while Southern congressmen claimed that moving the capital would degrade the American sense of dignity and strength (however, many Southern congressmen simply did not want to move the capital north of the Mason–Dixon line).[68] On September 21, the House of Representatives voted to strike down a proposal to relocate the capital from Washington, D.C. by a margin of 83 to 54.[69]

On February 3, 1815, in an effort to guarantee that the federal government would always remain in the area, Washington property owners funded the building of the Old Brick Capitol,[70] a larger meeting space where the Supreme Court now stands.[71] Construction of the Old Brick Capitol cost $25,000 and was funded primarily through the sale of stocks. The largest donor was Daniel Carroll of Duddington, a rich English property owner in the area.[72] Construction began on July 4, and concluded in December. Congress met in the Old Brick Capitol between December 1815 and December 1819, when the Capitol reopened.[73]

The Capitol reconstruction took much longer than anticipated. The Old Brick Capitol took only five months to complete; the Capitol took twelve years.[28] A committee appointed by Congress to investigate the damage to the District concluded that it was cheaper to rebuild the already existing and damaged buildings than to build an entirely new one.[74] On February 13, President Madison and Congress passed legislation to borrow $500,000 to repair the public buildings, including the Capitol, “on their present sites in the city of Washington”.[75] Benjamin Latrobe, architect of the Capitol who took over for William Thornton in 1803, was rehired to repair the building on April 18.[76] He immediately requested 60,000 feet of boards, 500 tons of stone, 1,000 barrels of lime, and brick.[76]

With the $500,000 borrowed from Washington banks,[73] Latrobe was able to rebuild the two wings and the central dome before being fired in 1818 for being difficult.[77] Charles Bulfinch took over and officially completed the renovations by 1826.[28] Bulfinch modified Latrobe’s design by increasing the height of the Capitol dome to match the diameter of 86 ft. With the reconstruction of the public buildings in Washington, the value of land in the area increased dramatically, paving the way for the expansion of the city that developed in the years leading up to the American Civil War.[78]

Appendix

Notes

  1.  “Burning of Washington, D.C.;Chesapeake Campaign”The War of 1812. genealogy, Inc. Retrieved August 24, 2010.
  2. “The tornado that stopped the burning of Washington – National Constitution Center”National Constitution Center. August 25, 2015. Retrieved October 11, 2018.
  3. “The White House at War: The White House Burns: The War of 1812”. White House Historical Association. Retrieved June 9, 2011.
  4. Greenpan, Jesse (August 22, 2014). “The British Burn Washington, D.C., 200 Years Ago”History.com. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
  5. Hitsman & Graves 1999, p. 240.
  6. Morriss 1997, p. 98.
  7. Morriss 1997, p. 100.
  8. “Interview With War of 1812 Author Steve Vogel”History Net. June 13, 2013. Retrieved January 17, 2021.
  9. Morriss 1997, p. 101.
  10.  Cruikshank 2006, p. 402.
  11. “The British Burn Washington, D.C., 200 Years Ago”History.com. 29 August June 2018. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  12. “Five myths about the burning of Washington”Washington Post. June 28, 2013. Retrieved January 16, 2021.
  13. Cruikshank 2006, p. 414.
  14. “Brookeville 1814”. Maryland State Archives. Retrieved November 12, 2013.
  15. Porter, Maj Gen Whitworth (1889). History of the Corps of Royal Engineers Vol I. Chatham: The Institution of Royal Engineers.
  16. “Robert Ross”NPS. Retrieved January 17, 2021.
  17. “In 1814, British forces burned the U.S. Capitol”Washington Post. Retrieved January 16, 2021.
  18. “Interview With War of 1812 Author Steve Vogel”History Net. June 13, 2013. Retrieved January 17, 2021.
  19. “Trump blames Canada for torching White House. Meet the ‘reluctant arsonist'”CBC News. June 18, 2018. Retrieved January 16, 2021.
  20. “In 1814, British forces burned the U.S. Capitol”Washington Post. Retrieved January 16, 2021.
  21. “Why Americans Celebrate the Burning of Washington”TIME magazine. Retrieved January 16, 2021. Cockburn, who accompanied Ross into the capital, reportedly wanted to burn the entire city in retaliation for American depredations in Canada. But it was an army operation and Ross’ call, and he would have none of it.
  22. Herrick 2005, p. 92.
  23. Muller, Charles, G. (1963). The Darkest Day: The Washington-Baltimore Campaign During the War of 1812. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 139.
  24. United States Department of the Treasury. “An account of the receipts and expenditures of the United States for the year 1810”Library of Congress.
  25. Allen, William C. (2001). “Destruction and Restoration, 1814–1817” in History of the United States Capitol: A Chronicle of Design, Construction, and Politics. Washington, DC: United States Government Publishing Office. p. 98.
  26. Herrick 2005, p. 99.
  27. Muller, Charles G. (1963). The Darkest Day: The Washington-Baltimore Campaign During the War of 1812. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 140.
  28. “History of the U.S. Capitol Building”Architect of the Capitol | United States Capitol.
  29. United States Congress, Thirteenth Congress (October 29, 1814). “Report from the superintendent of the Public Buildings” in the Report of the Committee appointed to … inquire into the cause … of the invasion of the city of Washington by the British forces. Washington, DC: United States Congress. p. 362.
  30. Pitch, Anthony S. (1998). The Burning of Washington: The British Invasion of 1814. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. pp. 49–50.
  31. Willets includes Dolley Madison’s letter to her sister describing these events. (Willets 1908, p. 219)
  32. Siegel & Block 2009, Descendant …
  33. Jennings 1865, pp. 14–15.
  34. Corrected spelling of names of staff comes from Willets (Willets 1908, p. 221)
  35. Sioussat was the first Master of Ceremonies of the White House (McCormick 1904, p. 170).
  36. In 1814, British forces burned the U.S.Capitol [[1]], Achenbach, Joel, Washington Post, 2014
  37. Editors, History com. “British troops set fire to the White House”HISTORY.
  38. Gura 2009, Descendants of a slave ….
  39. Fredriksen 2001, p. 116.
  40. “Business methods in the War Department : Report of board appointed in compliance with request of Senate Select Committee to Investigate Methods of Business in Executive Departments : United States. War Dept. Board on Business Methods : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming”Internet Archive.
  41. “The Patent Fire of 1836”. patentlaws.com. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  42. One Hot Commodity: Great Patent Fire of 1836 United States Patent Office”. Kids pages. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Archived from the original on December 18, 2011. Retrieved December 16, 2011.
  43. Crawford, p222, quoting letter from Cockburn to Cochrane dated August 27, 1814 ‘The Enemy himself, on our entering the Town set fire to … ‘
  44. Roosevelt 1902, p. 47.
  45. “It is one of the few structures to have escaped the fire in 1814 when the British invaded Washington.” (Gerson & Branam 1973, p. 5)
  46. “When the British captured Washington on August 24, 1814, and Captain Tingey ordered the Navy Yard set fire to prevent the British using the Yard and its ships to their advantage, both Quarters A (Tingey’s House) and Quarters B (Lieutenant Haraden’s House) were untouched, but the people the neighborhood plundered them to such an extent that ‘not a movable object from cellar to garret was left, and even the fixtures and locks off the doors were taken.” (Taylor 1973, p. 3,5)
  47. “Act of July 14, 1832, to pay estate of Edward Barry $568.35 for property destroyed in the burning of the Washington navy-hard by the British in 1814 … Act of March 2, 1833, to pay the estate of George Hodge $824.18 for property destroyed in the burning of the Washington navy-yard by the British in 1814.” (Reports … 1894, p. 174)
  48. George 2000, p. 111.
  49. The War of 1812, Scene 5 “An Act of Nature”, History Channel, 2005
  50. NWS staff 2011.
  51. Cruikshank 2006, p. 414.
  52. “Why Americans Celebrate the Burning of Washington”TIME magazine. Retrieved January 16, 2021. Cockburn, who accompanied Ross into the capital, reportedly wanted to burn the entire city in retaliation for American depredations in Canada. But it was an army operation and Ross’ call, and he would have none of it.
  53. Peter Snow “When Britain Burned the White House” 2012
  54. “No. 16939”The London Gazette. September 27, 1814. pp. 1942–1943.
  55. Landry 2009, p. 255.
  56. “James Madison, Proclamation – Calling All Citizens to Unite in Defense of the District of Columbia September 1, 1814”. The American Presidency Project.
  57. Howe, David Walker (2007). What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815–1848. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. p. 67.
  58. Hitsman & Graves 1999, pp. 243–244.
  59. Hickey 1989, p. 202.
  60. Elting 1995, p. 220.
  61. Hitsman & Graves 1999, pp. 244–245.
  62. POTSI (archived): HM Queen Elizabeth addresses the colonial Parliament in 1976
  63. The odd objects looted from Washington DC in 1814. BBC News. 29 August 2014
  64. Allen, William C. (2001). “Destruction and Restoration, 1814–1817”. History of the United States Capitol: A Chronicle of Design, Construction, and Politics. Washington, DC: United States Government Publishing Office. p. 99.
  65. Burton, Harold H.; Waggaman, Thomas E. (1952). “The Story of the Place: Where First and A Streets Formerly Met at What Is Now the Site of the Supreme Court Building”. Records of the Columbia Historical Society, Washington, D.C. Washington, DC.: Historical Society of Washington. 51/52: 141. JSTOR 40067303.
  66. Skeen, C. Edward (2003). “The Fourteenth Congress Begins”. 1816: America Rising. University Press of Kentucky. pp. 35–52.
  67. Clark, Allen C. (1938). Daniel Carroll of Duddington (Vol. 39 ed.). Washington, DC.: Columbia Historical Society. p. 36.
  68. Green, Constance McLaughlin (1962). “Phoenix on the Potomac, 1812–1817”. Washington: A History of the Capital, 1800–1950. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 64–65.
  69. Burton, Harold H.; Waggaman, Thomas E. (1952). “The Story of the Place: Where First and A Streets Formerly Met at What Is Now the Site of the Supreme Court Building”. Records of the Columbia Historical Society, Washington, D.C. Washington, DC.: Historical Society of Washington. 51/52: 141–142. JSTOR 40067303.
  70. Green, Constance McLaughlin (1962). “Phoenix on the Potomac, 1812–1817”. Washington: A History of the Capital, 1800–1950. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 65.
  71. Clark, Allen C. (1938). Daniel Carroll of Duddington (Vol. 39 ed.). Washington, DC.: Columbia Historical Society. p. 35.
  72. Burton, Harold H.; Waggaman, Thomas E. (1952). “The Story of the Place: Where First and A Streets Formerly Met at What Is Now the Site of the Supreme Court Building”. Records of the Columbia Historical Society, Washington, D.C. Washington, DC.: Historical Society of Washington. 51/52: 142. JSTOR 40067303.
  73. Burton, Harold H.; Waggaman, Thomas E. (1952). “The Story of the Place: Where First and A Streets Formerly Met at What Is Now the Site of the Supreme Court Building”. Records of the Columbia Historical Society, Washington, D.C. Washington, DC.: Historical Society of Washington. 51/52: 143. JSTOR 40067303.
  74. Allen, William C. (2001). “Destruction and Restoration, 1814–1817”. History of the United States Capitol: A Chronicle of Design, Construction, and Politics. Washington, DC: United States Government Publishing Office. p. 100.
  75. United States Congress, Thirteenth Congress (February 13, 1815). Session III, Statue III, Ch. 41 (PDF). Washington, DC: United States Congress. p. 205.
  76. Allen, William C. (2001). “Destruction and Restoration, 1814–1817”. History of the United States Capitol: A Chronicle of Design, Construction, and Politics. Washington, DC: United States Government Publishing Office. p. 103.
  77. Skeen, C. Edward (2003). “The Fourteenth Congress Begins”. 1816: America Rising. University Press of Kentucky. p. 37.
  78. Green, Constance McLaughlin (1962). “Phoenix on the Potomac, 1812–1817”. Washington: A History of the Capital, 1800–1950. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 73.

Bibliography

Further Reading


Originally published by Wikipedia, 12.28.2004, under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license.

Comments

comments

%d bloggers like this: