From early times China engaged in extensive trade relations with other countries, From early times China engaged in extensive trade relations with other countries until the mid-19th century.
From early times China engaged in extensive trade relations with other countries, and until the mid 19th century Chinese officials directed by the imperial court in Beijing dictated the conditions under which such trade was conducted. From the 16th century to mid 1800s, three cities became the centers of the trading system linking the “Middle Kingdom” to Western European powers and eventually the United States: Macau, Canton, and Hong Kong.
Macau was under Portuguese control from 1557 to 1999. From the late 1700s the center of Western trade activities shifted upriver to foreign quarters at Canton (Guangzhou), which remained under the tight regulation of Chinese authorities. The so-called Canton trade system reflected the strength of the Chinese state at the height of the Manchu-led Ching dynasty (1644–1911); and the collapse of this system in the mid 19th century marked the beginning of the long decades of China’s decline and humiliation as a great power.
Two factors in particular precipitated the end of Chinese control over trade with the West. One was opium, which the Western powers began smuggling into China to compensate for a paucity of other exports. The other was naval technology epitomized by the emergence of Western steam-powered vessels deployed as both merchant ships and warships. The collapse of the Canton system was marked by the Opium War of 1839 to 1842, in which the British defeated the Chinese under the banner of free trade and forced them to legalize opium imports, open new ports to trade, and agree to a low fixed tariff.
In the wake of the Opium War, Canton carried on as a trading port but British commercial interests in particular were extended elsewhere—most dramatically to the newly acquired harbor at Hong Kong. Hong Kong became not merely a symbol of the new era of “free trade,” but a bona-fide British colony—arch-symbol indeed of the new era of China’s loss of autonomy.
In Western eyes, the Canton trade system became the source of a romanticized image of both Western commercial activity and China itself. Fine examples of Chinese art and luxury items—porcelain, lacquer, silk, and furniture—were prized in upper-class circles in Europe and the United States. Tea became a favorite import in the West. And at the same time, foreign merchants commissioned both Western and Chinese artists to provide a visual record of their own involvement in the China trade.
This export art provides the visual flesh and bones of this unit and enables viewers to see the China trade as the foreign traders themselves wished it to be seen by their contemporaries by home and remembered by later generations. There exists no counterpart visual record for domestic consumption on the Chinese side. The foreign enclaves seemed marginal to Chinese at the time; there was no domestic market for viewing outsiders; there was indeed as yet no technology of mass reproduction. Photography still lay ahead.
What we encounter in these visuals, in short, is the Canton trade system as portrayed largely through (and for) the eyes of the non-Chinese—colorful, romantic, sometimes exotic, often heroic, and exceedingly incomplete.
Expansion and Trade
From 1500 to 1800, the great empires of Europe and Asia expanded across the world, conquering new territories and intensifying their internal and external trading networks. We know best the story of the European expansions into the New World, India, and Southeast Asia, or Russia’s conquest of Siberia, but China’s armies, settlers, and traders also penetrated distant regions, extending market networks and creating increasingly dense populations on the frontiers. Under the Ming and Qing dynasties, the Chinese empire reached a new peak of population and expanded its territory to an unprecedented degree. The Ming dynasty (1368–1644) in the 16th century held off Mongol raids in the northwest while expanding military garrisons in the southwest. In addition, large numbers of Chinese moved into Southeast Asian countries, rising to become the dominant commercial forces there. The Manchu founders of the Qing dynasty (1636–1911), after conquering Beijing in 1644 and Taiwan in 1683, established an even larger empire which continued to expand until the mid 18th century. At its peak, it controlled Manchuria, Outer and Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, and Taiwan, and exerted influence on its neighbors in Russia, Burma, and Vietnam.
The Western European powers, beginning with the Portuguese and soon followed by the Spanish, Dutch, French, and English, went down the coast of Africa and across the Indian Ocean in pursuit of the spices of the east. In 1492, Columbus headed across the Atlantic Ocean in search of the same oriental luxuries. Once the Spanish took the Philippines and discovered the rich mines of Bolivia in the 1560s and 1570s, silver and gold flowed from Latin America across the Atlantic and Pacific, tying together the markets of the Old and New worlds for the first time. Bullion moved from Latin American colonies to Spain, and from there to Dutch and English financial markets, where European merchants brought the silver to Asia to buy precious commodities. The Manila galleon brought bullion directly across the Pacific from Latin America to Spain’s colonial possessions in Asia. Most of the silver ended up in China, because the great empire’s major exports of tea, porcelain, and silk commanded high prices and the Europeans had no equivalent goods to offer in return. China sent out its high quality commodities and craft goods to meet eager European consumers through the southern coastal ports of Macau, Canton, and Hong Kong. Thus began the continuous interaction of China with Western traders that marks the opening of modern times.
From ancient times, China had always traded with the outside world. Camel caravans crossing the silk routes of Central Eurasia carried textiles, tea, and porcelain to the Middle East and Europe since the first century BCE, and a trickle of adventurous priests and travelers had followed these routes eastward to China. Beginning in the 16th century, however, large numbers of ordinary Western and Chinese people met each other in the great trading cities of South China, doing business across a wide cultural divide. Here the large empires of East and West, with their ships, guns, commercial goods, and officials, had to negotiate acceptable rules to support profitable trade. The leasing of Macau to the Portuguese in 1557 began the system of regulated trade on the coast which evolved into the Canton or “Old China” trade system of the 18th and early 19th centuries. Under this system, the Chinese state restricted the access of Westerners to the interior of China, but allowed them to conduct trade under the name of “tribute,” or gifts to the emperor, which he gratefully returned. This system of commercial exchange lasted from the 18th century until 1842, when China’s loss in the Opium War caused its abandonment. Then a new era of Sino-Western relations—a much less equal one—began.
The British East India Company
For Europeans, the 16th and 17th centuries were the era of exploration, the promotion of Christianity, expansion of maritime trade, and piracy. The Portuguese led the way down the coast of Africa and into the Indian Ocean, supporting their commercial interests with military force. By mounting cannon on their small caravel ships, they were able to muscle their way into a flourishing Asian trade system dominated by Arabs, Indians, Malays, and Chinese.
The Portuguese gained footholds on the Asian mainland at Goa in India and Macau in China by negotiating with the local authorities. Coastal China had suffered from pirate raids led by Chinese smugglers collaborating with Japanese and other armed maritime groups, but Portuguese aid in the suppression of the pirates gained them the reward of a leasehold in Macau. As silver from the New World flowed into China through Macau, Chinese officials found the Portuguese port a profitable source of currency. But they kept the Portuguese confined to the city and did not allow them to penetrate inland.
The Dutch and English followed the Portuguese into Asia using a different political and commercial system. They founded joint stock trading companies, each of which was given monopoly rights to trade in the East Indies. The companies expanded trade for their countries and shareholders, but also used military force to intervene on the mainland. The Dutch founded Batavia (modern Jakarta) in Java as the base for access to the spice islands of Southeast Asia, and they occupied Taiwan and gained access to Japan. The Dutch East India Company (Vereenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie or VOC), founded in 1602, supported the expansion and eventual colonization of Java and the rest of Indonesia.
The first British East India Company, founded in 1600, established footholds by negotiation with local powers on the coast of India. Like the Dutch VOC, it was a national chartered company dedicated to gaining profits from the Asian trade. By the mid 17th century, it had 23 “factories,” or warehouses and living quarters for trading, along the Indian coast, and competed with the Dutch for access to the spice islands at Malacca.
England emerged in the late 17th century from decades of internal warfare just as the Qing empire was completing its conquest of China. In 1684 the Kangxi emperor reopened free trade access to the Chinese coast. A second British company opened in 1698 to seize on the new opportunities, and the two merged to form the united East India Company in 1708. In 1711, it gained its first outpost in Canton. Soon Canton became the central focus of trade with China for both the trading companies and the Qing empire.
Canton’s natural advantages—its location and its local topography—gave it the preferred position on the China coast for foreign trade. The monsoon winds determined the access of trading ships to the south China coast. From June to September the winds blew from the southwest, allowing sailing ships to ride smoothly downwind across the Indian Ocean, the Arabian Sea, and the South China Sea. When the monsoon ended in October, ships remained in the Canton region for a four-month trading season. The northeast monsoon winds beginning in January gave them smooth sailing back to India and ultimately England. The Pearl River leading from Macau to Canton was easily accessible on the monsoon winds to foreigners. At the same time, since Canton itself was not on the coast, imperial officials could control foreigners who came and went along the river.
Profits and Perils: Western Ships in the 19th-Century China Trade
Ships of the Canton Trade
Traders sailing to China from the West expected great profits but risked great dangers. Typhoons, pirates, and foreign warships could easily destroy a merchant’s career, but those who succeeded made huge profits, as much as 400 to 500 percent on one voyage. Shipbuilders improved the stability and size of the merchant ships in order to enhance the prospects of the China trade. The huge East Indiamen carried the bulk goods on which the trade was based—tea and textiles. The fast clippers, first designed in the United States and copied by others, carried the freshest teas home and smuggled the valuable illegal opium cargoes past Chinese officials. Steamships finally destroyed the Chinese restraints on foreign trade when they arrived in the 1820s, because they could move into shallow waters and help warships bombard Chinese defenses.
The ships of the East India trade, known as East Indiamen, were the largest merchant sailing ships ever built. They needed both a great deal of space for their cargo and heavy guns to defend against pirates and warships. They increased in capacity from 400 tons in the 18th century to a maximum of 1100 to 1400 tons in the 19th century, and were forty to fifty meters long. In the 1760s, about 20 ships per year visited China, but by the 1840s there were over 300 per year. Despite their size, they faced many dangers. The Royal Captain, 860 tons, 44 meters long, sank off the coast of China in 1773. The Earl of Abergavenny, built in 1797, weighed 1440 tons and was wrecked off the English coast in 1805. Many of these armed merchant ships were built in India and used only for runs from India to China. Those that voyaged from England or the U.S. faced even greater dangers on the high seas. William C. Hunter, a young American, traveled from Salem to China and back three times, and his journey took at least four months each way. Everyone traveling to China risked destruction by typhoons and death by disease or even falling overboard.
Despite these perils, the China trade was so profitable that it attracted daring seamen and ambitious merchants. It also stimulated advances in nautical technology, like the tea and opium clipper ships. Because tea was a seasonal crop, consumers wanted it as fresh as possible. The Americans designed tea clippers in the 1830s to compete with the English. They held less cargo than the East Indiamen and they were built for speed, with narrow pointed hulls and large sail areas. The tea clipper Medina (pictured above in the collage of ships) was active in 1857, at a size of 410 tons. Their peak speed reached 30 kilometers per hour. Even mounted with cannon, on average they sailed at twice the speed of traditional merchant ships. In the Great Tea Race of 1866, two tea clippers raced each other from Canton to London, and both arrived after three months within one hour of each other. The fast clippers also served as excellent opium smuggling ships, as they could outrun the Chinese junks with ease.
The first steamships came to Canton from India in 1828, followed by the East India Company ship Forbes in 1830 and the Jardine in 1835. More than any other technology, steamships brought about the destruction of the Canton trade system. It was not their speed, but their shallow draft, that allowed them to reach Canton without interference from pilots or Chinese officials. The Nemesis (pictured above in the collage of ships), the warship that destroyed the Chinese forts during the Opium War, was a 700-ton ship with only six feet of draft. The highly maneuverable steamships could carry opium to many places, they could tow warships into position, and they could completely escape the controls the Chinese had long exercised over the Canton trade.
In sum, the maintenance of the Canton trade system depended as much on natural geography as on administrative controls. Once the steamships and clippers overcame these natural constraints, the imperial system of controls could not survive.
- Brook, Timothy and Wakabayashi, Bob Tadashi, editors. Opium Regimes: China, Britain, and Japan, 1839–1952 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000).
- Chaitkin, Anton. Treason in America: From Aaron Burr to Averell Harriman (New York: New Benjamin Franklin House, 1985).
- Cheng, Christina Miu Bing. Macau: A Cultural Janus (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1999).
- Cheong, W. E. The Hong Merchants of Canton: Chinese Merchants in Sino-Western Trade p. 71 (Routledge, 1997).
- The China Trade and Its Influences, exhibition catalog (The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 1941).
- The China Trade: Romance and Reality (De Cordova and Dana Museum and Park), an exhibition organized in collaboration with the Museum of the American China Trade, Milton, Mass., June 22 to Sept. 16, 1979 (Lincoln: De Cordova Museum, 1979).
- Chu, Cindy Yik-yi, ed. Foreign communities in Hong Kong, 1840s–1950s, (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).
- Crossman, Carl L. The Decorative Arts of the China Trade: Paintings, Furnishings, and Exotic Curiosities (Woodbridge, Suffolk: Antique Collectors’ Club, 1991).
- Dyce, Charles M. Personal Reminiscences of Thirty Years’ Residence in the Model Settlement Shanghai, 1870-1900: Shanghai, 1870-1900 (Chapman & Hall, ltd., 1906)
- Fay, Peter Ward. The Opium War, 1840–1842: Barbarians in the Celestial Empire in the Early Part of the Nineteenth Century and the War by Which They Forced Her Gates Ajar (New York: Norton, 1976).
- Forbes, Robert Bennet. Personal Reminiscences, pp. 346-347 (Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1882).
- Frayler, John. Retired on the Fourth of July http://www.nps.gov/sama/historyculture/upload/Vol4No6WilliamStory.pdf
- Grant, Frederic D. Jr. Hong Merchant Litigation in the American Courts http://www.grantboston.com/Articles/HMLitigation.pdf
- Greenberg, Michael. British Trade and the Opening of China 1800-1842, p. 66
- (Cam U Press Archive).
- Gunn, Geoffrey C. Encountering Macau: a Portugese city-state on the periphery of China, 1557–1999 (Boulder: Westview Press, 1996).
- Haddad, John Rogers. The Romance of China: Excursions to China in U. S. Culture, 1778-1876 (Columbia University Press, 2008).
- History of the China Tradehttp://www.bl.uk/reshelp/findhelpregion/asia/china/guidesources/chinatrade/
- Hudson, Geoffrey Francis. Europe & China; a Survey of Their Relations from the Earliest Times to 1800 (London, 1931: reprint Boston: Beacon Press, 1961).
- Jourdain, Margaret and R. Soame Jenyns. Chinese Export Art in the 18th Century (London: Spring Books, 1967).
- Kerr, Phyllis Forbes, editor. Letters from China: the Canton-Boston Correspondence of Robert Bennet Forbes, 1838-1840, (Mystic, Connecticut: Mystic Seaport Museum, 1996)
- Lamas, Rosemarie Wank-Nolasco. Everything in Style: Harriett Low’s Macau (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press).
- Loines, Elma. The China Trade Post-Bag of the Seth Low Family of Salem and New York, 1829–1873 (Manchester: Falmouth Pub. House, 1953).
- Magazine Antiques, 1998, (Brant Publications, Inc. 1998)
- Malcolm, Howard. Travels in South-Eastern Asia (Boston: Gould, Kendall, and Lincoln, 1839).
- Map of the Eurasian Trade Routes in the 13th Century, http://www.drben.net/ChinaReport/Sources/China_Maps/China_Empire_History/Map-EurAsian_Trade_Routes-1200-1300AD-1A.html
- Morse, Hosea Ballou. The Chronicles of the East India Company, Trading to China 1635–1834, volumes 1–5 (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1926–29).
- Munn, Christopher. Anglo-China: Chinese People and British Rule in Hong Kong, 1841–1880 (Richmond, Surrey: Curzon, 2001).
- Paine, Ralph Delahaye. The Old Merchant Marine: a Chronicle of American Ships and Sailors (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1919; Toronto, Glasgow, Brook, & co., London, Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press, 1921).
- Smith, Philip Chadwick Foster. The Empress of China (Univ of Pennsylvania Press, 1984).
- Sullivan, Michael. The Meeting of Eastern and Western Art (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997).
- Tsang, Steve Yui-Sang. A Modern History of Hong Kong (London, New York: I.B. Tauris, 2007).
- Turner, J.A. Kwang Tung or Five Years in South China, With an Introduction by H.J. Lethbridge (Hong Kong, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1894).
- Views of the Pearl River Delta: Macau, Canton and Hong Kong, Exhibition Catalog (Hong Kong & Salem, Massachusetts: Hong Kong Museum of Art & Peabody Essex Museum, 1997).
- Waley, Arthur. The Opium War Through Chinese Eyes (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958).
- Warner, John. Hong Kong Illustrated: Views and News, 1840–1890 (J. Warner, 1981).
- Wei, Betty Peh-T’i. Ruan Yuan, 1764–1849: the Life and Work of a Major Scholar-Official in Nineteenth-Century China Before the Opium War (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2006).
- White, Barbara-Sue, ed. Hong Kong: Somewhere Between Heaven and Earth (Oxford University Press, USA, 2006).
- Wood, Frances. No Dogs and Not Many Chinese: Treaty-Port Life in China 1843–1943 (London: John Murray, 1998).
- Zheng, Yangwen. The Social Life of Opium in China (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Originally published by Visualizing Cultures, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States license.