The violent sacking and pillaging of Benin City by the British in 1897 was framed as a justified response.
In Ryan Coogler’s 2018 film, Black Panther, the supervillain Erik Killmonger goes to a fictional museum—The Museum of Great Britain. While there, he meets with the curator of African art. Killmonger challenges the curator on her introduction of one of the African objects, asserting that “it was taken by British soldiers in Benin, but it’s from Wakanda [a fictional African nation in the film], and it’s made of vibranium [a fictional metal].” He further astonishes the curator when he casually says that he will “take it off [her] hands.” The curator declares, “These items aren’t for sale.” Killmonger then asks: “How do you think your ancestors got these? You think they paid a fair price? Or did they take it, like they took everything else?”
This exchange points to an actual moment in Britain’s colonization of West Africa: the violent destruction and looting of Benin City, the capital of the Kingdom of Benin (currently, Benin City is the capital of Edo State in present-day southern Nigeria).
During the 1897 attack, the British stole an estimated 10,000 objects made of copper alloy (plaques and other artworks), carved and uncarved ivory, works made of wood and coral, and human remains (such as skulls and teeth). Today, these objects are known collectively and loosely as the Benin “Bronzes,” and are displayed or stored globally in museums and galleries, private and family collections, and other institutions.1 Originally, the plaques were displayed in the audience courtyard of the Oba’s (king’s) palace. The plaques were commissioned and created during the reign of two kings, Oba Esigie and his son, Oba Orhogbua. Sometime during the 17th century, the plaques were taken down. The British found them in an otherwise empty building in the Oba’s compound during the invasion of the city.
The violent sacking and pillaging of Benin City, (usually referred to as the Benin Expedition or the Punitive Expedition of 1897), had been framed in British newspaper articles of the time as a justified act of retaliation in response to another episode: the Phillips Expedition.
The Phillips Expedition
In June 1896, the Niger Coast Protectorate (NCP) appointed James Robert Phillips as its Deputy Commissioner and Consul. The British claimed Benin City was within the NCP’s domain, and tried multiple times (beginning in 1862) to get the reigning Oba (king) to sign a trade treaty that would give the British access to commodities in the area. In March 1892, the king at the time, Oba Ovonramwen, signed a trade treaty with the British. Marking the treaty with an ‘X’, it is unclear to what extent Oba Ovonramwen understood the conditions of the treaty, as multiple individuals served as translators.
The Niger Coast Protectorate (1893–1900) was a territory supposedly under British protection located in the Niger Delta region of present-day Nigeria. It was originally called the Oil Rivers Protectorate (1884–93), named after palm oil, a highly sought-after commodity. The British signed trade treaties with local chiefs and kings, offering protection in exchange for compliance with the conditions of the treaties.
Ultimately, NCP officials regarded Oba Ovonramwen as an obstacle to British access to trade commodities such as palm kernels, as they perceived that the king was not fulfilling his part of the agreement. To force Oba Ovonramwen to comply with the conditions of the trade treaty (which were far more advantageous to the British), Phillips requested permission from the British government to send an armed force to Benin City. In an effort to have his request fulfilled, he added that the vast amounts of ivory in Benin City would help to pay for the costs of the armed force.
After this request was denied by the Foreign Office, Phillips led (without permission) an expedition of nine British men and an estimated 200–250 carriers in January 1897.2 When Phillips’ party reached Gwato, they received warnings that any white man who approached Benin City would be killed. Phillips’ party was on their way to Benin City during the Ague festival, or festival of yams. Since the Ague festival required that the Oba refrain from certain practices, such as meeting with foreigners, he was restricted from receiving the Phillips’ party.3 Not heeding the warnings, the Phillips’ expedition continued with their mission. All of the British participants, except for two, were killed. It is unclear how many carriers were also killed.4
This incident, known as the Phillips Expedition, has been framed as the main impetus for the violence perpetrated by the British soon after. However, a few months after Oba Ovonramwen signed the trade treaty in 1892, NCP officials had expressed their desire to depose him. Accusing the king of hindering trade with the British, NCP officials wanted to be rid of Oba Ovonramwen nearly five years before the Phillips Expedition. NCP officials perceived that the Oba’s authorization of human sacrifices and other practices (which the British referred to as “fetishes” or “juju”) caused certain commodities to be taxed heavily or to be restricted from being traded. The British would use the existence of human sacrifice as another reason to justify their attack on Benin City.5 The ambush of Phillips and his party (it is unclear how many non-British participants were injured and killed) gave the British a justification to finally remove Oba Ovonramwen and to destroy Benin City.
The Punitive Expedition at Benin City
Newspapers informed the British public about the Phillips Expedition days after it occurred, and reported that a punitive expedition was a likely response. On January 13, 1897, Vice Admiral Harry Rawson was appointed to lead an immense force to Benin City: an estimated 1,400 soldiers and 2,500 carriers, along with NCP staff, medics, and scouts.6
The Punitive Expedition of 1897 took place between February 9 to 27. During this 3-week campaign, the British machine-gunned, bombarded, and torched villages and towns, and indiscriminately massacred countless Edo people, the inhabitants of the Kingdom of Benin (and present-day Edo State). It is unknown what the death toll was. On February 18, the British took Benin City. They destroyed buildings, homes, and palaces, desecrated sacred sites, and blew up a sacred tree. The British believed that they were cleansing the city and breaking the power associated with “fetishes” or “juju” through these acts of demolition and vandalization. During their attack, the British also looted the wide range of objects referred to as the Benin “Bronzes.”
Dan Hicks, Curator of World Archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum, reminds us that besides taking objects from Benin City, the British also took photographs. In one of the most well-known and circulated photographs from this expedition, we see six white men sitting among a massive array of looted objects. In the foreground, we see a pile of elephant tusks (uncarved ivory), a bowl, bells, statues of leopards and people, and other objects (likely a stool and jugs or jars). In the middle ground, the men sit comfortably (several look at the camera). The man to the far right holds a statue of a head against his right leg. Behind the men is a large pile of loot (numerous elephant tusks) and perhaps debris from the destruction of the city. The background is blurry, but people can be seen underneath the roof of a building. Slightly towards the right of the roof, a brass-cast snake appears to slither down.
Oba Ovonramwen escaped during the invasion of Benin City, but surrendered himself to the British in August 1897. He was put on trial for the killing of Phillips and his party, but was not found guilty. However, six other chiefs were convicted.7 Oba Ovonramwen was exiled to Calabar, where he lived until his death in 1914.
The Punitive Expedition at Benin City was not an isolated incident, as other punitive expeditions were led by the British in present-day Nigeria (Brohemie, 1894; Brass, 1895; Ediba, 1896; Agbor, 1896; and Cross River, 1896). These expeditions were also characterized by the burning of villages and towns, the desecration of sacred spaces, the displacement and murder of indigenous peoples, and overthrow or murder of local chiefs or kings seen as impediments to British control. The Punitive Expedition at Benin City should be understood not as an anomaly, but as part of a recurring pattern in which the British used violent means to conquer lands that they claimed for themselves and to terrorize and subdue their inhabitants
Display and Interpretation of Benin “Bronzes”
Within months of the Punitive Expedition at Benin City, some of the stolen loot was displayed in various museums in London. For example, 300 plaques were loaned to The British Museum and exhibited. Charles Hercules Read and Ormonde Maddock Dalton, the Keeper and Senior Assistant in the British Museum’s Department of British and Medieval Antiquities and Ethnography respectively, praised the beauty and sophistication of the plaques. Regarding them as works of art, Read and Dalton acknowledged that their makers possessed remarkable experience, knowledge, and technical skill on par with Italian Renaissance artists.
Similarly, Felix von Luschan, Assistant Director at the Königliches Museum für Völkerkunde in Berlin, promoted the metalwork and ivory as art. He invoked the highly-esteemed, skilled craftsmanship associated with the Italian Renaissance sculptor and goldsmith, Benvenuto Cellini, to describe the casting employed. However, in spite of their great admiration for the Benin art and material culture, Read and Dalton posited that the fabrication of the plaques could not have been made by the contemporary Edo people, whom they described as “barbarous.”8 Like other British contemporaries, Read and Dalton perceived Benin City to be in a state of “degeneration.”9
Based on the representations of Europeans (including their manner of dress and weapons) on the plaques, Read and Dalton asserted that they were made in the middle of the 16th century, and speculated (incorrectly) that the Portuguese taught or helped the Edo to create these works.10
Attributing the Benin works to the Portuguese reflects racist attitudes that deny the Edo as the rightful creators of their own art and material culture. Ese Vivian Odiahi, who has conducted interviews with members of the guild of casters, reminds us that casting is an “indigenous art” of the Kingdom of Benin, and the earliest guild of casters can be traced back to the reign of Oba Oguola in the 13th century.11
Returning the Benin “Bronzes”
alls for the return of the Benin “Bronzes” have been issued since 1936, when Oba Akenzua II made the first formal request to the British Museum. G.M. Miller instructed the British Museum to return to Oba Akenzua II three items that he had loaned previously: “two coral crowns and a coral bead garment.”12 Today, museums, galleries, and other institutions that have Benin “Bronzes” in their collections are grappling with what to do with them in the face of mounting diplomatic pressures, especially within the last decade, to repatriate or restitute them. Dan Hicks, who is working to return the Benin “Bronzes” in the Pitt Rivers Museum, makes clear, “the arrival of loot into the hands of western curators, its continued display in our museums and its hiding-away in private collections, is not some art-historical incident of ‘reception’, but an enduring brutality that is refreshed every day that an anthropology museum like the Pitt Rivers opens its doors.”13
Prince Gregory Akenzua, one of the great-grandsons of Oba Ovonramwen, asserts, “[the] artwork can be said to represent the history of the Benin people for centuries. It was taken from us. It was like ripping pages out of our history.”14
- The Benin “Bronzes” is a misnomer, as the items said to be created from bronze are actually copper alloy, made with varying amounts of copper, tin, and zinc. Bronze is an alloy of copper and tin, while brass is an alloy of copper and zinc.
- While Phillips’ request to lead an armed expedition to Benin City was rejected, Paddy Docherty points out that the officers in the party still carried revolvers with them. However, Phillips instructed them to conceal these weapons. See Docherty, Blood and Bronze: the British Empire and the Sack of Benin, pp. 147.
- For more on the Ague festival, see Kathy Curnow, “The art of fasting: Benin’s Ague ceremony,” African Arts 30 (1997), pp. 46-53. Also see Barnaby Phillips, Loot: Britain and the Benin Bronzes, pp. 52-53.
- Dan Hicks states that “initial press reports stated that all nine white men had been killed, along with 250 carriers,” but points out that “claims that ‘more than 200 carriers were killed’ are not clearly substantiated by documentary record.” See Hicks, The Brutish Museums: The Benin Bronzes, Colonial Violence and Cultural Restitution, pp. 92.
- Barnaby Phillips notes that the first mention of human sacrifice in Benin City comes from a Portuguese account in 1538, and that succeeding European accounts take a morbid interest in it or do not mention it at all. See Phillips, Loot, pp. 28-31, 35-37. Prince Edun Akenzua, one of the great grandsons of Oba Ovonramwen, wrote in an article in 1960 that the practice of human sacrifice was “indeed reprehensible, but because it was so much a part of the religion of old Benin, it could not be so easily dismissed.” Akenzua, quoted in Phillips, Loot, pp. 37. Originally published as Edun Akenzua, “Benin, 1897; A Bini’s View,” Nigeria Magazine 65 (1960), pp. 177-190.
- Dan Hicks, The Brutish Museums, pp. 110.
- Dan Hicks states that all six chiefs were executed. See Hicks, The Brutish Museums, pp. 131. However, Paddy Doherty says that three were executed, two committed suicide, and one died before the trial. See Docherty, Blood and Bronze, pp. 197.
- Charles Hercules Read and Ormonde Maddock Dalton, “Works of art from Benin City,” pp. 371.
- Charles Hercules Read and Ormonde Maddock Dalton, “Works of art from Benin City,” pp. 366. For more on the concept of degeneration in relation to the interpretation of the Benin “Bronzes,” see Annie E. Combes, “Ethnography, popular culture and institutional power: narratives of Benin culture in the British Museum, 1897-1992,” pp. 142-157.
- Charles Hercules Read and Ormonde Maddock Dalton, “Works of art from Benin City,” pp. 373. Dan Hicks also notes that other people, including Felix von Luschan, proposed “Egyptian, Arab, or even Etruscan connections.” See Hicks, The Brutish Museums, pp. 187.
- Ese Vivian Odiahi, “The Origin and Development of the Guild of Bronze Casters of Benin Kingdom up to 1914,” pp. 178-179.
- Dan Hicks, The Brutish Museums, pp. 196.
- Dan Hicks, The Brutish Museums, pp. 137.
- Prince Gregory Akenzua, quoted in an interview in 2019 with Barnaby Phillips. See Phillips, Loot, pp. 159.
- Annie E. Combes, “Ethnography, popular culture and institutional power: narratives of Benin culture in the British Museum, 1897-1992,” Studies in the History of Art 47 (1996), pp. 142-157.
- Kathy Curnow, “The art of fasting: Benin’s Ague ceremony,” African Arts 30 (1997), pp. 46-53.
- Paddy Docherty, Blood and Bronze: the British Empire and the Sack of Benin (Oxford University Press, 2022).
- Kathryn Wysocki Gunsch, “Art and/or Ethnographica?: The reception of Benin works from 1897–1935,” African Arts 46, no. 4 (2013), pp. 22-31.
- Kathryn Wysocki Gunsch, “Seeing the world: displaying foreign art in Berlin, 1898-1926,” Journal of Art Historiography (2015), pp. 1-25.
- Dan Hicks, The Brutish Museums: The Benin Bronzes, Colonial Violence and Cultural Restitution (London: Pluto Press, 2020).
- Ese Vivian Odiahi, “The Origin and Development of the Guild of Bronze Casters of Benin Kingdom up to 1914,” AFRREV IJAH: An International Journal of Arts and Humanities 6, no. 1 (2017), pp. 176-187.
- Barnaby Phillips, Loot: Britain and the Benin Bronzes (Oneworld Publications, 2021).
- Barbara Plankensteiner, “Benin-Kings and Rituals: Court Arts from Nigeria,” African Arts 40, no. 4 (2007), pp. 74-87.
- Charles Hercules Read and Ormonde Maddock Dalton, “Works of art from Benin City,” The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 27 (1898), pp. 362-382.
Originally published by Smarthistory, 04.25.2023, under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.