No new fossil fuel extraction projects can be opened if we want to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.
A fossil fuel is a hydrocarbon-containing material formed underground from the remains of dead plants and animals that humans extract and burn as fuel. The main fossil fuels are coal, petroleum and natural gas, which humans extract through mining and drilling. Fossil fuels may be burnt to provide heat for use directly (e.g. for cooking), to power engines (such as internal combustion engines in motor vehicles), or to generate electricity.
The principal origin of fossil fuels is the anaerobic decomposition of buried dead organisms, containing organic molecules created in ancient photosynthesis. The transitions from these source materials to high-carbon fossil fuels typically requires a geological process of millions of years, sometimes more than 650 million years.
Fossil fuels can be transformed into other chemicals or derivatives by the refining and chemical industries. Commonly-used refined fossil fuels include kerosene, gasoline and propane, and common chemicals include most plastics and agricultural chemicals such as fertilizers and pesticides. 84% of primary energy consumption in the world and 64% of electricity was from fossil fuels in 2019.
Fossil fuels cause serious environmental damage and direct negative consequences on local communities at every stage in their use: extraction, transportation and consumption of the fuels. Over 80% of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted by humans is from burning fossil fuels: around 35 billion tonnes a year, compared to 4 billion from land use change. Natural processes on Earth, mostly absorption by the ocean, can only remove a small part of this amount, therefore there is a net increase of many billion tonnes of atmospheric carbon dioxide per year. Methane leaks are also significant.: 52 Carbon dioxide and methane are greenhouse gases, that is they trap heat in the earth’s atmosphere. Fossil fuels are the main source of greenhouse gas emissions causing global warming and ocean acidification. Additionally, most air pollution deaths are due to fossil fuel particulates and noxious gases: it is estimated that this pollution costs over 3% of global GDP, and that fossil fuel phase-out would save millions of lives each year.
Recognition of the climate crisis, pollution and other negative impacts caused by fossil fuels has led to a widespread policy transition and activist movement focused on ending their use in favor of sustainable energy. However, because the fossil fuel industry is so heavily integrated in the global economy and heavily subsidized, this transition is expected to have significant economic impacts. Many stakeholders argue that this change needs to be a just transition and create policy that addresses the societal burdens created by the stranded assets of the fossil fuel industry. International policy, in the form of Sustainable Development Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy, Sustainable Development Goal 13: Climate Action and the Paris Climate Agreement, is designed to facilitate this transition at a global level. In 2021, the International Energy Agency concluded that no new fossil fuel extraction projects could be opened if the global economy and society wants to avoid the worst impacts of climate change and meet international goals for climate change mitigation.
The theory that fossil fuels formed from the fossilized remains of dead plants by exposure to heat and pressure in Earth’s crust over millions of years was first introduced by Andreas Libavius “in his 1597 Alchemia [Alchymia]” and later by Mikhail Lomonosov “as early as 1757 and certainly by 1763”. The first use of the term “fossil fuel” occurs in the work of the German chemist Caspar Neumann, in English translation in 1759. The Oxford English Dictionary notes that in the phrase “fossil fuel” the adjective “fossil” means “[o]btained by digging; found buried in the earth”, which dates to at least 1652, before the English noun “fossil” came to refer primarily to long-dead organisms in the early 18th century.
Aquatic phytoplankton and zooplankton that died and sedimented in large quantities under anoxic conditions millions of years ago began forming petroleum and natural gas as a result of anaerobic decomposition. Over geological time this organic matter, mixed with mud, became buried under further heavy layers of inorganic sediment. The resulting high temperature and pressure caused the organic matter to chemically alter, first into a waxy material known as kerogen, which is found in oil shales, and then with more heat into liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons in a process known as catagenesis. Despite these heat-driven transformations (which increase the energy density compared to typical organic matter by removal of oxygen atoms), the energy released in combustion is still photosynthetic in origin.
Terrestrial plants tended to form coal and methane. Many of the coal fields date to the Carboniferous period of Earth’s history. Terrestrial plants also form type III kerogen, a source of natural gas. Although fossil fuels are continually formed by natural processes, they are classified as non-renewable resources because they take millions of years to form and known viable reserves are being depleted much faster than new ones are generated.
There is a wide range of organic compounds in any given fuel. The specific mixture of hydrocarbons gives a fuel its characteristic properties, such as density, viscosity, boiling point, melting point, etc. Some fuels, like natural gas, for instance, contain only very low boiling, gaseous components. Others such as gasoline or diesel contain much higher boiling components.
Fossil fuels are of great importance because they can be burned (oxidized to carbon dioxide and water), producing significant amounts of energy per unit mass. The use of coal as a fuel predates recorded history. Coal was used to run furnaces for the smelting of metal ore. While semi-solid hydrocarbons from seeps were also burned in ancient times, they were mostly used for waterproofing and embalming.
Commercial exploitation of petroleum began in the 19th century.
Natural gas, once flared-off as an unneeded byproduct of petroleum production, is now considered a very valuable resource. Natural gas deposits are also the main source of helium.
Heavy crude oil, which is much more viscous than conventional crude oil, and oil sands, where bitumen is found mixed with sand and clay, began to become more important as sources of fossil fuel in the early 2000s. Oil shale and similar materials are sedimentary rocks containing kerogen, a complex mixture of high-molecular weight organic compounds, which yield synthetic crude oil when heated (pyrolyzed). With additional processing, they can be employed instead of other established fossil fuels. During the 2010s and 2020s there was disinvestment from exploitation of such resources due to their high carbon cost relative to more easily-processed reserves.
Prior to the latter half of the 18th century, windmills and watermills provided the energy needed for work such as milling flour, sawing wood or pumping water, while burning wood or peat provided domestic heat. The wide-scale use of fossil fuels, coal at first and petroleum later, in steam engines enabled the Industrial Revolution. At the same time, gas lights using natural gas or coal gas were coming into wide use. The invention of the internal combustion engine and its use in automobiles and trucks greatly increased the demand for gasoline and diesel oil, both made from fossil fuels. Other forms of transportation, railways and aircraft, also require fossil fuels. The other major use for fossil fuels is in generating electricity and as feedstock for the petrochemical industry. Tar, a leftover of petroleum extraction, is used in the construction of roads.
The burning of fossil fuels has a number of negative externalities – harmful environmental impacts where the effects extend beyond the people using the fuel. The actual effects depend on the fuel in question. All fossil fuels release CO2 when they burn, thus accelerating climate change. Burning coal, and to a lesser extent oil and its derivatives, contribute to atmospheric particulate matter, smog and acid rain.
Climate change is largely driven by the release of greenhouse gasses like CO2, with the burning of fossil fuels being the main source of these emissions. In most parts of the world climate change is negatively impacting ecosystems. This includes contributing to the extinction of species (see also extinction risk from climate change) and reducing people’s ability to produce food, thus adding to the problem of world hunger. Continued rises in global temperatures will lead to further adverse effects on both ecosystems and people, with the World Health Organization having stated climate change is the greatest threat to human health in the 21st century.
Combustion of fossil fuels generates sulfuric and nitric acids, which fall to Earth as acid rain, impacting both natural areas and the built environment. Monuments and sculptures made from marble and limestone are particularly vulnerable, as the acids dissolve calcium carbonate.
Fossil fuels also contain radioactive materials, mainly uranium and thorium, which are released into the atmosphere. In 2000, about 12,000 tonnes of thorium and 5,000 tonnes of uranium were released worldwide from burning coal. It is estimated that during 1982, US coal burning released 155 times as much radioactivity into the atmosphere as the Three Mile Island accident.
Burning coal also generates large amounts of bottom ash and fly ash. These materials are used in a wide variety of applications (see Fly ash reuse), utilizing, for example, about 40% of the United States production.
In addition to the effects that result from burning, the harvesting, processing, and distribution of fossil fuels also have environmental effects. Coal mining methods, particularly mountaintop removal and strip mining, have negative environmental impacts, and offshore oil drilling poses a hazard to aquatic organisms. Fossil fuel wells can contribute to methane release via fugitive gas emissions. Oil refineries also have negative environmental impacts, including air and water pollution. Coal is sometimes transported by diesel-powered locomotives, while crude oil is typically transported by tanker ships, requiring the combustion of additional fossil fuels.
A variety of mitigating efforts have arisen to counter the negative effects of fossil fuels. This includes a movement to use alternative energy sources, such as renewable energy. Environmental regulation uses a variety of approaches to limit these emissions; for example, rules against releasing waste products like fly ash into the atmosphere. Other efforts include economic incentives, such as increased taxes for fossil fuels, and subsidies for alternative energy technologies like solar panels.
In December 2020, the United Nations released a report saying that despite the need to reduce greenhouse emissions, various governments are “doubling down” on fossil fuels, in some cases diverting over 50% of their COVID-19 recovery stimulus funding to fossil fuel production rather than to alternative energy. The UN secretary general António Guterres declared that “Humanity is waging war on nature. This is suicidal. Nature always strikes back – and it is already doing so with growing force and fury.” However, Guterres also said there is still cause for hope, anticipating Joe Biden’s plan for the US to join other large emitters like China and the EU in adopting targets to reach net zero emissions by 2050.
Illness and Deaths
Environmental pollution from fossil fuels impacts humans because particulates and other air pollution from fossil fuel combustion cause illness and death when inhaled. These health effects include premature death, acute respiratory illness, aggravated asthma, chronic bronchitis and decreased lung function. The poor, undernourished, very young and very old, and people with preexisting respiratory disease and other ill health are more at risk. Global air pollution deaths due to fossil fuels in 2018 have been estimated at over 8 million people, nearly 1 in 5 deaths worldwide.
While all energy sources inherently have adverse effects, the data shows that fossil fuels cause the highest levels of greenhouse gas emissions and are the most dangerous for human health. In contrast, modern renewable energy sources appear to be safer for human health and cleaner. The death rate from accidents and air pollution in the EU are as follows per terawatt-hour: coal (24.6 deaths), oil (18.4 deaths), natural gas (2.8 deaths), biomass (4.6 deaths), hydropower (0.02 deaths), nuclear energy (0.07 deaths), wind (0.04 deaths), and solar (0.02 deaths). The greenhouse gas emissions from each energy source are as follows, measured in tonnes: coal (820 tonnes), oil (720 tonnes), natural gas (490 tonnes), biomass (78-230 tonnes), hydropower (34 tonnes), nuclear energy (3 tonnes), wind (4 tonnes), and solar (5 tonnes). As the data shows, coal, oil, natural gas, and biomass cause higher death rates and higher levels of greenhouse gas emissions than hydropower, nuclear energy, wind, and solar power. Scientists propose that 1.8 million lives have been saved by replacing fossil fuel sources with nuclear power.
Fossil fuel phase-out is the gradual reduction of the use and production of fossil fuels to zero.
It is part of the ongoing renewable energy transition. Current efforts in fossil fuel phase-out involve replacing fossil fuels with sustainable energy sources in sectors such as transport, and heating. Alternatives to fossil fuels include electrification, green hydrogen and aviation biofuel. Phase-out policies include both demand-side and supply-side constraints, whereas demand-side approaches seek to reduce fossil-fuel consumption, supply-side initiatives seek to constraint production to accelerate the pace of energy transition and reduction in emissions.
Just transition is a framework developed by the trade union movement to encompass a range of social interventions needed to secure workers’ rights and livelihoods when economies are shifting to sustainable production, primarily combating climate change and protecting biodiversity. In Europe, advocates for a just transition want to unite social and climate justice, for example, for coal workers in coal-dependent developing regions who lack employment opportunities beyond coal.
Fossil fuel divestment or fossil fuel divestment and investment in climate solutions is an attempt to reduce climate change by exerting social, political, and economic pressure for the institutional divestment of assets including stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments connected to companies involved in extracting fossil fuels.
Fossil fuel divestment campaigns emerged on campuses in the United States in 2011 with students urging their administrations to turn endowment investments in the fossil fuel industry into investments in clean energy and communities most impacted by climate change. In 2012, Unity College in Maine became the first institution of higher learning to divest its endowment from fossil fuels.
By 2015, fossil fuel divestment was reportedly the fastest growing divestment movement in history. In October 2021, a total of 1,485 institutions representing $39.2 trillion in assets worldwide had begun or committed to a divestment from fossil fuels.
Air pollution from fossil fuels in 2018 has been estimated to cost US$2.9 trillion, or 3.3% of global GDP.
Fossil fuel subsidies are energy subsidies on fossil fuels. They may be tax breaks on consumption, such as a lower sales tax on natural gas for residential heating; or subsidies on production, such as tax breaks on exploration for oil. Or they may be free or cheap negative externalities; such as air pollution or climate change due to burning gasoline, diesel and jet fuel. Some fossil fuel subsidies are via electricity generation, such as subsidies for coal-fired power stations.
Despite the G20 countries having pledged to phase-out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies, they may be continued because of voter demand or for energy security. Global fossil fuel consumption subsidies in 2021 have been estimated at 440 billion dollars.Eliminating fossil fuel subsidies would greatly reduce global carbon emissions and would reduce the health risks of air pollution. As of 2021 fossil fuel subsidies are thought to be higher than environmentally harmful agricultural subsidies and environmentally harmful water subsidies.
“Fossil fuels lobby” is a term used to label the paid representatives of corporations involved in the fossil fuel industry (oil, gas, coal), as well as related industries like chemicals, plastics, aviation and other transportation. Because of their wealth and the importance of energy, transport and chemical industries to local, national and international economies, these lobbies have the capacity and money to attempt to have outsized influence governmental policy. In particular, the lobbies have been known to obstruct policy related to environmental protection, environmental health and climate action.
Lobbies are active in most fossil-fuel intensive economies with democratic governance, with reporting on the lobbies most prominent in Canada, Australia, the United States and Europe, however the lobbies are present in many parts of the world.
Big Oil companies such as ExxonMobil, Shell, BP, TotalEnergies, Chevron Corporation, and ConocoPhillips are among the largest corporations associated with the fossil fuels lobby. The American Petroleum Institute is a powerful industry lobbyist for Big Oil with significant clout in Washington, D.C.Some observers have also been critical of the presence of major fossil fuel companies at global forums for decision making, like the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,Paris Climate Agreement negotiations, the Plastic and other international forums. The lobby is known for exploiting international crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, or the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, to try to roll back existing regulations or justify new fossil fuel development.
- “Fossil fuel”. ScienceDaily. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
- “Fossil fuels”. Geological Survey Ireland. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
- “thermochemistry of fossil fuel formation” (PDF).
- Paul Mann, Lisa Gahagan, and Mark B. Gordon, “Tectonic setting of the world’s giant oil and gas fields”, in Michel T. Halbouty (ed.) Giant Oil and Gas Fields of the Decade, 1990–1999, Tulsa, Okla.: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, p. 50, accessed 22 June 2009.
- Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (28 November 2020). “Energy”. Our World in Data.
- Ambrose, Jillian (12 April 2020). “Carbon emissions from fossil fuels could fall by 2.5bn tonnes in 2020”. The Guardian.
- “Global Carbon Project (GCP)”. www.globalcarbonproject.org. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
- “What Are Greenhouse Gases?”. US Department of Energy. Retrieved 9 September 2007.
- “Chapter 2: Emissions trends and drivers” (PDF). IPCC_AR6_WGIII. 2022.
- “Quantifying the Economic Costs of Air Pollution from Fossil Fuels” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 April 2020.
- Zhang, Sharon. “Air Pollution Is Killing More People Than Smoking—and Fossil Fuels Are Largely to Blame”. Pacific Standard. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
- Dickie, Gloria (4 April 2022). “Factbox: Key takeaways from the IPCC report on climate change mitigation”. Reuters. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
- “Why are fossil fuels so hard to quit?”. Brookings. 8 June 2020. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
- “IPCC: We can tackle climate change if big oil gets out of the way”. the Guardian. 5 April 2022. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
- Monga, Jean Eaglesham and Vipal (20 November 2021). “Trillions in Assets May Be Left Stranded as Companies Address Climate Change”. Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
- Bos, Kyra; Gupta, Joyeeta (1 October 2019). “Stranded assets and stranded resources: Implications for climate change mitigation and global sustainable development”. Energy Research & Social Science. 56: 101215.
- “No new oil, gas or coal development if world is to reach net zero by 2050, says world energy body”. the Guardian. 18 May 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
- Oil fields map Archived 6 August 2012 at the Wayback Machine. quakeinfo.ucsd.edu
- Hsu, Chang Samuel; Robinson, Paul R. (2017). Springer Handbook of Petroleum Technology (2nd, illustrated ed.). Springer. p. 360.
- Caspar Neumann; William Lewis (1759). The Chemical Works of Caspar Neumann … (1773 printing). J. and F. Rivington. pp. 492–.
- “fossil”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) – “fossil […] adj. […] Obtained by digging; found buried in the earth. Now chiefly of fuels and other materials occurring naturally in underground deposits; esp. in FOSSIL FUEL n.”
- “fossil”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) – “fossil […] n. […] Something preserved in the ground, esp. in petrified form in rock, and recognizable as the remains of a living organism of a former geological period, or as preserving an impression or trace of such an organism.”
- Schmidt-Rohr, K. (2015). “Why Combustions Are Always Exothermic, Yielding About 418 kJ per Mole of O2“, J. Chem. Educ. 92: 2094-2099.
- Miller, G.; Spoolman, Scott (2007). Environmental Science: Problems, Connections and Solutions. Cengage Learning.
- Ahuja, Satinder (2015). Food, Energy, and Water: The Chemistry Connection. Elsevier
- “Encyclopædia Britannica, use of oil seeps in ancient times”. Retrieved 9 September 2007.
- Bilkadi, Zayn (1992). “Bulls From the Sea: Ancient Oil Industries”. Aramco World. Archived from the original on 13 November 2007.
- Ball, Max W.; Douglas Ball; Daniel S. Turner (1965). This Fascinating Oil Business. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
- Kaldany, Rashad, Director Oil, Gas, Mining and Chemicals Dept, World Bank (13 December 2006). Global Gas Flaring Reduction: A Time for Action! (PDF). Global Forum on Flaring & Gas Utilization. Paris. Retrieved 9 September 2007.
- “Oil Sands Global Market Potential 2007”. Retrieved 9 September 2007.
- Editor, Damian Carrington Environment (12 December 2017). “Insurance giant Axa dumps investments in tar sands pipelines”. The Guardian. Retrieved 24 December 2017.
- Oswald Spengler (1932). Man and Technics (PDF). Alfred A. Knopf. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
- Griffin, Rodman (10 July 1992). “Alternative Energy”. 2 (2): 573–596.
- Michael Stephenson (2018). Energy and Climate Change: An Introduction to Geological Controls, Interventions and Mitigations. Elsevier.
- Neukom, Raphael; Barboza, Luis A.; Erb, Michael P.; Shi, Feng; et al. (2019). “Consistent multidecadal variability in global temperature reconstructions and simulations over the Common Era”. Nature Geoscience. 12 (8): 643–649.
- “Global Annual Mean Surface Air Temperature Change”. NASA. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
- “The European Power Sector in 2020 / Up-to-Date Analysis on the Electricity Transition” (PDF). ember-climate.org. Ember and Agora Energiewende. 25 January 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 January 2021.
- EPA (19 January 2017). “Climate Impacts on Ecosystems”. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
- “WHO calls for urgent action to protect health from climate change”. World Health Organization. November 2015. Archived from the original on 8 October 2015. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
- World Meteorological Organization (2020). WMO Statement on the State of the Global Climate in 2019. WMO-No. 1248. Geneva.
- Coal Combustion: Nuclear Resource or Danger Archived 5 February 2007 at the Wayback Machine – Alex Gabbard
- Nuclear proliferation through coal burning Archived 27 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine – Gordon J. Aubrecht, II, Ohio State University
- American Coal Ash Association. “CCP Production and Use Survey” (PDF).
- Damian Carrington (2 December 2020). “World is ‘doubling down’ on fossil fuels despite climate crisis – UN report”. The Guardian. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
- Fiona Harvey (2 December 2020). “Humanity is waging war on nature, says UN secretary general”. The Guardian. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
- “The Production Gap: The discrepancy between countries’ planned fossil fuel production and global production levels consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C or 2°C”. UNEP. December 2020. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
- Liodakis, E; Dashdorj, Dugersuren; Mitchell, Gary E. (2011). The nuclear alternative: Energy Production within Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1342. p. 91.
- February 19; Chaisson, 2021 Clara. “Fossil Fuel Air Pollution Kills One in Five People”. NRDC. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
- “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- Jogalekar, Ashutosh. “Nuclear power may have saved 1.8 million lives otherwise lost to fossil fuels, may save up to 7 million more”. Scientific American Blog Network. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- Green, F., & Denniss, R. (2018). “Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies”. Climatic Change. 150 (1): 73–87.
- “Climate Frontlines Briefing – No Jobs on a Dead Planet” (PDF). International Trade Union Confederation. March 2015. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
- “Just Transition Platform”. European Commission – European Commission. Retrieved 19 August 2020.
- “Divestment Commitments”. Gofossilfree.org. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
- Gibson, Dylan; Duram, Leslie (2020). “Shifting Discourse on Climate and Sustainability: Key Characteristics of the Higher Education Fossil Fuel Divestment Movement”. Sustainability. 12 (23): 10069.
- “Divestment from Fossil Fuels”. Unity College. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
- “Fossil fuel divestment: a brief history”. The Guardian. Retrieved 25 March 2015.
- “1485 institutions with assets over $39.2 Trillion have committed to divest from fossil fuels”. Stand.earth. 26 October 2021. Retrieved 1 December 2021.
- “Energy Transition Investment Hit $500 Billion in 2020 – For First Time”. BloombergNEF. (Bloomberg New Energy Finance). 19 January 2021. Archived from the original on 19 January 2021.
- Chrobak, Ula (author); Chodosh, Sara (infographic) (28 January 2021). “Solar power got cheap. So why aren’t we using it more?”. Popular Science. Archived from the original on 29 January 2021. Chodosh’s graphic is derived from data in “Lazard’s Levelized Cost of Energy Version 14.0” (PDF). Lazard.com. Lazard. 19 October 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 January 2021.
- Kerr, Simeon; Massoudi, Arash; Raval, Anjli (19 December 2019). “Saudi Aramco touches $2tn valuation on second day of trading”. Financial Times. Retrieved 10 January 2020.
- Raval, Anjli; Kerr, Simeon; Stafford, Philip (5 December 2019). “Saudi Aramco raises $25.6bn in world’s biggest IPO”. Financial Times. Retrieved 10 January 2020.
- “Update on recent progress in reform of inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption” (PDF). 2021.
- George, Johannes Urpelainen and Elisha (14 July 2021). “Reforming global fossil fuel subsidies: How the United States can restart international cooperation”. Brookings. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- Brower, Derek; Wilson, Tom; Giles, Chris (25 February 2022). “The new energy shock: Putin, Ukraine and the global economy”. Financial Times. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- “Energy subsidies”. International Energy Agency. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- Coady, David; Parry, Ian; Sears, Louis; Shang, Baoping (March 2017). “How Large Are Global Fossil Fuel Subsidies?”. World Development. 91: 11–27.
- John Schwartz (5 December 2015). “On Tether to Fossil Fuels, Nations Speak With Money”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 6 December 2015. Retrieved 5 December 2015.
…the elimination of subsidies as one of the most effective strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
- Ross, Michael L.; Hazlett, Chad; Mahdavi, Paasha (January 2017). “Global progress and backsliding on gasoline taxes and subsidies”. Nature Energy. 2 (1): 16201.
- “Fossil fuel subsidies: If we want to reduce greenhouse gas emissions we should not pay people to burn fossil-fuels”. Our World in Data. Retrieved 4 November 2021.
- “Local Environmental Externalities due to Energy Price Subsidies: A Focus on Air Pollution and Health” (PDF). World Bank.
- “Protecting Nature by Reforming Environmentally Harmful Subsidies: The Role of Business | Earth Track”. www.earthtrack.net. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
- “Why fossil fuel lobbyists are dominating climate policy during Covid-19”. Greenhouse PR. 23 July 2020. Retrieved 4 September 2020.
- Welle (www.dw.com), Deutsche. “Lobbying threat to global climate action | DW | 05.11.2021”. DW.COM. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
- Laville, Sandra (22 March 2019). “Top oil firms spending millions lobbying to block climate change policies, says report”. The Guardian.
- The Guardian, 19 Jul. 2021 “How a Powerful U.S. Lobby Group Helps Big Oil to Block Climate Action”
- Yale Environment 360, 19 Jul. 2019 “Fossil Fuel Interests Have Outspent Environmental Advocates 10:1 on Climate Lobbying”
- Reuters Events, 23 Nov. 2015 “Lobbying: Climate Change–Beware Hot Air”
- “IPCC: We can tackle climate change if big oil gets out of the way”. the Guardian. 5 April 2022. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
- Welle (www.dw.com), Deutsche. “Oil and gas companies exploit coronavirus to roll back environmental regulations | DW | 16.04.2020”. DW.COM. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
- “US fossil fuel industry leaps on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to argue for more drilling”. the Guardian. 26 February 2022. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
- Manjoo, Farhad (24 March 2022). “Opinion | We’re in a Fossil Fuel War. Biden Should Say So”. The New York Times.
Originally published by Wikipedia, 04.07.2002, under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license.